Wilmar, Incorporated v. Corsillo

Decision Date04 February 1975
Citation211 S.E.2d 802,286 N.C. 421
PartiesWILMAR, INCORPORATED v. Joseph A. CORSILLO.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Welling & Miller, for the defendant.

Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston, for the plaintiff.

Petition of defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 24 N.C.App. 271, 210 S.E.2d 427. Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • United Laboratories, Inc. v. Kuykendall
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 28, 1988
    ...involving a janitorial supply salesman. See Wilmar, Inc. v. Corsillo, 24 N.C.App. 271, 210 S.E.2d 427 (1974), cert. denied, 286 N.C. 421, 211 S.E.2d 802 (1975). In Wilmar, the restrictive covenant specifically noted that the defendant salesman would, through personal contact with plaintiff'......
  • Milner Airco, Inc. of Charlotte, NC v. Morris
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 1993
    ...in the initial employment contract." Wilmar, Inc. v. Corsillo, 24 N.C.App. 271, 273, 210 S.E.2d 427, 429 (1974), cert. denied, 286 N.C. 421, 211 S.E.2d 802 (1975) (citations omitted). However, if an employment relationship already exists without a covenant not to compete, any such future co......
  • Brooks Distributing Co., Inc. v. Pugh
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • November 1, 1988
    ...contract." Wilmar, Inc. v. Corsillo, 24 N.C.App. 271, 273, 210 S.E.2d 427, 429 (1974) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 286 N.C. 421, 211 S.E.2d 802 (1975). However, if an employment relationship already exists without a covenant not to compete, any such future covenant must be based upon ......
  • Amdar, Inc. v. Satterwhite, 7710SC694
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 1, 1978
    ...area and activity. We think this case is more like Wilmar, Inc. v. Corsillo, 24 N.C.App. 271, 210 S.E.2d 427, Cert. denied, 286 N.C. 421 (1974), 211 S.E.2d 802 (1975). We consider very appropriate the following statement by Chief Justice Stacy in Sonotone Corp. v. Baldwin, 227 N.C. 387, 390......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT