Wilson v. Benefits Review Bd.

Decision Date05 November 1984
Docket NumberNo. 84-1110,84-1110
Citation748 F.2d 198
PartiesJames K. WILSON, Petitioner, v. BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor and Valley Camp Coal Company, Respondents.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

H. John Taylor, Rand, W. Va., for petitioner.

Jennifer L. Sargus, Wheeling, W. Va. (Recht & Johnson, Wheeling, W. Va., on brief) and Jeffrey Bernstein, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:

James K. Wilson, a coal miner, appeals from a decision of the Benefits Review Board denying his claim for black lung disability payments under 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901-45 (1982) (the Black Lung Act). We reverse and direct an award of benefits.

I

The Department of Labor initially ruled on August 1, 1979, finding that Wilson was eligible for benefits and that Valley Camp Coal Company was the responsible employer. At Valley Camp's request, the claim was referred to the Office of Administrative Law Judges for a formal hearing. The ALJ conducted a hearing and issued his decision on October 10, 1980 finding Wilson eligible for black lung benefits commencing April 1, 1978. Valley Camp appealed to the Benefits Review Board, which reversed the award of benefits on November 30, 1983. The Board held that the medical evidence in the record established "as a matter of law" that Wilson suffered from no disabling respiratory impairment and was able to do his usual coal mine work. 20 C.F.R. Sec. 727.203(b)(2) (1984).

The issues on this appeal are whether there was substantial evidence to support the ALJ's decision and whether the Board reviewed the ALJ's decision under the proper standard. Beavan v. Bethlehem Mines Corp., 741 F.2d 689 (4th Cir.1984); Amigo Smokeless Coal Co. v. Director, OWCP, 642 F.2d 68 (4th Cir.1981); see also Sun Shipbuilding & Drydock Co. v. McCabe, 593 F.2d 234, 237 (3rd Cir.1979). The standard for Board review is set forth in the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: 1 "findings of fact in the decision under review by the Board shall be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole." 33 U.S.C. Sec. 921(b)(3). This provision of the LHWCA is incorporated into the Black Lung Act by 30 U.S.C. Sec. 932(a). The ultimate issue thus is whether there was substantial evidence to support the ALJ's decision. See 20 C.F.R. Sec. 802.301 (1984). 2

The evidence principally consists of testimony describing three medical examinations of Wilson. The first was conducted on July 19, 1975 by Dr. Ralph J. Jones in connection with Wilson's claim for State of West Virginia Occupational Pneumoconiosis benefits. Dr. Jones diagnosed pneumoconiosis "with no impairment for work therefrom," but he stated that Wilson had not been given an exercise tolerance test because of a severe back condition.

Wilson was next examined by Dr. Willard Pushkin on July 5, 1979, at the request of the United States Department of Labor. A chest x-ray and pulmonary function studies were performed. Dr. Pushkin concluded that Wilson suffered from pneumoconiosis causally related to coal mine employment with "minimal impairment." Dr. Pushkin also assessed Wilson's effort during the pulmonary function study tests as "submaximal," but did not explain the reasons for this conclusion. The chest x-ray performed on July 5, 1979 was first read by Dr. James T. Smith who found "fine bilateral nodulation consistant [sic] with occupational pneumoconiosis" and concluded that Wilson indeed suffered from pneumoconiosis, category 1/2 p. This x-ray was re-read on July 27, 1979 by Dr. Jeremy Attman who deemed the film "completely negative."

Wilson was then examined on September 12, 1979 by Dr. Anthony C. Daugherty at the request of the Valley Camp Coal Company. The results of the pulmonary function studies and arterial blood gas tests conducted at the direction of Dr. Daugherty were not equal to or less than the regulatory criteria of 20 C.F.R. Sec. 727.203. 3

An x-ray ordered by Dr. Daugherty was performed and read by Dr. Jose Caringel. According to Dr. Caringel, this x-ray revealed "fine fibronodular densities in the right mid lung field and in the bases." Dr. Daugherty interpreted the pulmonary function studies as indicating a "mild amount of obstructive changes." He also stated that the arterial blood gas studies revealed "mild hypoxemia." After reviewing Dr. Caringel's x-ray report describing fibronodular densities, Dr. Daugherty stated that he could not "appreciate this pattern," mistakenly attributing those markings to Wilson's "chronic cigarette smoking." The record, however, shows that Wilson is a lifetime non-smoker. Dr. Daugherty concluded that Wilson was capable of "engaging in gainful employment with respect to his lungs."

II

The ALJ invoked a rebuttable presumption of total disability due to pneumoconiosis arising out of coal mine employment on the basis of x-ray evidence establishing the presence of the disease. 20 C.F.R. Sec. 727.203(a)(1). 4 He relied on the two x-rays taken at the request of Drs. Pushkin and Daugherty. He rejected Valley Camp's contention that the ventilatory and blood gas studies revealed that Wilson did not have pneumoconiosis and thus rebutted the presumption. Additionally, he found that Dr. Daugherty's recognition of a mild amount of distinctive changes was consistent with a finding of pneumoconiosis, emphasizing the erroneous statement that Wilson was a chronic smoker.

Valley Camp argued before the Board and here that the results of the blood gas studies and ventilatory function tests rebut the presumption of total disability pursuant to 20 C.F.R. Sec. 727.203(b)(2). That section provides that the presumption of total disability due to pneumoconiosis can be rebutted by medical evidence demonstrating that the claimant is still capable of working in the mines. Director, OWCP v. Beatrice Pocahontas Co., 698 F.2d 680, 682 (4th Cir.1983). The Benefits Review Board reversed the award of benefits, holding that the medical evidence established as a matter of law that Wilson was capable of doing his usual coal mine employment. 20 C.F.R. Sec. 727.203(b)(2). The Board based its decision on the reports of Drs. Jones and Daugherty, and considered the blood gas studies and ventilatory function tests. The Board further found that the findings of Dr. Pushkin did not constitute a contrary medical judgment from which the administrative law judge could rationally arrive at a different result.

We agree with the ALJ that the readings of the x-rays by Dr. Smith and Dr. Caringel were sufficient to establish a presumption of total disability. 20 C.F.R. Sec. 727.203(a)(1). Once the interim presumption is established by a qualifying diagnosis from either x-rays, blood gas studies, or ventilatory function tests, "a miner's failure to satisfy the remaining tests [for a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
73 cases
  • Harris v. Marsh
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of North Carolina
    • December 28, 1987
    ... ... After review of the extensive evidence presented, the court rendered its decision denying class certification ... Board of Regents, 728 F.2d 911 (7th Cir.1984); Jordan v. Wilson, 649 F.Supp. 1038, 1047-48 (M.D.Ala.1986) ...         With regard to the second element ... (d) Harassment and retaliation; and ... (e) Denial of equal employment benefits ...         Supplemental Pre-Trial Order at 23. See also Amended ... ...
  • Piney Mountain Coal Co. v. Mays
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • May 5, 1999
    ...U.S.C. § 932 (incorporating 33 U.S.C. § 921(b)(3)); Doss v. Director, OWCP, 53 F.3d 654, 658 (4th Cir.1995); Wilson v. Benefits Review Bd., 748 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir.1984). "Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla, and must do more than create a suspicion of the existence of......
  • Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service Co., 95-1697
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • April 5, 1996
    ... ... Houseman described her as an excellent employee in a September 1992 performance review, but also indicated that her attitude and "moodiness" would affect her promotability. In addition, ... was "ripe" but not selected for promotion in 1991; 3 that she received different pay, benefits, and seniority than younger males; that TAS failed to promote her in 1993 because of her age and ... ...
  • Noble v. Republic Servs. of Sc
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • June 2, 2021
    ... ... discriminatory act which adversely affects the terms, ... conditions, or benefits of the plaintiff's ... employment.” James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, ... Inc. , 368 ... filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo ... review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that ... there is no clear error on the face of the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT