Wilson v. Brown's Adm'r

Decision Date31 July 1855
PartiesWILSON et al. Appellants, v. BROWN'S ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. An appeal lies from the order of a county or probate court approving an administrator's sale of real estate.

Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court.

The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

F. P. Wright, for appellants.

No brief or appearance for respondent.

RYLAND, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

Hamilton, as administrator of the estate of Wm. Brown, deceased, made application to the county court of Jasper county, for the sale of lands of said estate, for the payment of debts. An order was made directing the sale of certain lands, or so much thereof as might be necessary for the payment of the debts of the estate.

The administrator made sale of the lands. Upon the presentation of his report of the sale, the appellants appeared in the county court, and filed their objections to the report. Wilson showed himself interested as a creditor, and Rickner and wife as heirs of the deceased.

The county court overruled the objections, and approved the report. The objectors then appealed from this order of the county court approving the sale by the administrator to the Circuit Court. In the Circuit Court, upon the calling of the case, Hamilton, the administrator, moved the court to dismiss the appeal, because no appeal lies from the judgment of the county court approving the report of an administrator's sale of real estate. The Circuit Court sustained this motion, dismissed the appeal, and rendered judgment against the appellants for costs. The appellants excepted to this decision of the court, filed their motion to set aside the order dismissing the appeal, which, being denied, they excepted, and bring the case by appeal to this court.

1. The only question in this case is, will an appeallie from the order of the county court, approving an administrator's sale of real estate, to the Circuit Court? If this question be answered in the affirmative, then the Circuit Court erred in dismissing the appeal. In the 8th article of the act concerning ““Administration,” (R. C. 1845, sec. 1,) we find that “appeals shall be allowed from the decision of the county court to the Circuit Court, in the following cases (after enumerating five classes, the sixth is as follows): “On all orders for the sale of real estate or slaves.” Here is authority expressly on the subject. It will not do to limit the appeal to the first order made in regard to the sale--to the order directing the sale only, and not to any other orders made concerning such sale. We read the sixth...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Ferguson's Adm'r v. Carson's Adm'r
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1885
    ...the order of publication. R. S., sec. 292; McCrary v. Manteer, 28 Mo. 446; Duff v. Doyle, 56 Mo. 301; McVey v. McVey, 51 Mo. 486; Wilson v. Brown, 21 Mo. 410. [3] There never was any payment or assignment of the Ober judgment, and it was a valid and subsisting demand in favor of Ferguson ag......
  • State ex rel. Deems v. Holtcamp
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 14, 1912
    ...the equities in the real estate. The propriety of the ruling can be tested on appeal from any order it may make confirming a sale. [Wilson v. Brown, 21 Mo. 410; McVey McVey, 51 Mo. 406; Desloge v. Tucker, 196 Mo. 587, 94 S.W. 283; Sec. 289, R. S. 1909.] For the foregoing reasons I respectfu......
  • Ferguson v. Carson
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • November 28, 1882
    ... ... against the estate.-- McCrary v. Menteer, 58 Mo ... 446; Duff v. Doyle, Admr., 56 Mo. 301; ... McVey, Curator, v. McVey, 51 Mo. 406; Wilson v ... Brown, Admr., 21 Mo. 410 ... ...
  • Ferguson v. Carson
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • November 28, 1882
    ...estate.-- McCrary v. Menteer, 58 Mo. 446; Duff v. Doyle, Admr., 56 Mo. 301; McVey, Curator, v. McVey, 51 Mo. 406; Wilson v. Brown, Admr., 21 Mo. 410. HENRY T. KENT, for the respondent: The claim of Ferguson appears to have originated since the death of Carson, and therefore is not such a cl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT