Wilson v. Commonwealth
Decision Date | 19 March 1929 |
Parties | Wilson v. Commonwealth. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky |
1. Criminal Law. — On objection to evidence obtained by search of premises, it was incumbent on commonwealth to produce search warrant relied upon, or, if it was lost, to account for loss and prove its contents by competent evidence.
2. Criminal Law. — Where commonwealth fails to produce search warrant relied upon or to account for its loss and prove contents by competent evidence, evidence obtained by search introduced should not be considered.
3. Criminal Law. — Effect of motion to exclude evidence obtained by search of premises and of motion to require commonwealth to produce affidavit and search warrant was same as if defendant had objected to introduction of evidence in first instance.
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.
A.W. BAKER for appellant.
J.W. CAMMACK, Attorney General, and GEO. H. MITCHELL, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Reversing.
Hubert Wilson was fined $250 and sentenced to 30 days in jail for a violation of the Prohibition Law (Laws 1922, c. 33). He has entered a motion for an appeal from that judgment. The evidence and rulings of the court are set out in narrative form in a bystander's bill of exceptions, which reads:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Acree v. Commonwealth
... ... its issuance and contents may be established by parole. The ... failure to do so rendered incompetent the testimony of the ... sheriff and the deputy sheriff and others present at the time ... disclosing the result of their search thereunder. Wilson ... v. Com., 228 Ky. 517, 15 S.W.2d 422; Craft v ... Com., 196 Ky. 277, 244 S.W. 696; Danella v ... Com., 207 Ky. 660, 269 S.W. 1011; Eaves v ... Com., 241 Ky. 140, 43 S.W.2d 528, and cases cited ... The ... rule is, where the premises and things of a defendant are ... ...