Wilson v. J. I. Case Co.

Decision Date22 March 1940
Docket NumberNo. 14058.,14058.
Citation139 S.W.2d 611
PartiesWILSON v. J. I. CASE CO.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Appeal from Denton County Court; Geo. P. Elbert, Judge.

Action by Herbert B. Wilson against J. I. Case Company, a corporation, wherein defendant filed a plea of privilege. From a judgment sustaining defendant's plea of privilege, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Geo. M. Hopkins, of Denton, for appellant.

Smithdeal, Shook & Lefkowitz, of Dallas, for appellee.

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant Herbert B. Wilson sued appellee J. I. Case Company, a private corporation, in the Justice of the Peace Court in Denton County, the suit being filed October 14, 1938, and on October 25, 1938, the defendant filed its plea of privilege to be sued in Dallas County, where it has its domicile.

On November 1, 1938, the plaintiff filed a controverting affidavit, but no notation was made on such controverting plea (or on the docket of the Justice of the Peace) stating a time for a hearing on the plea of privilege, and no notice of such controverting plea and of a hearing thereon was ever given the defendant—all of which is expressly required by Article 2008, Rev. Civ.Statutes, unless the parties to the cause agree upon a date for such hearing.

We find in the record that on November 26, 1938, the Justice of the Peace undertook to continue the hearing on the plea and controverting affidavit until December 27, 1938, "without prejudice". No reason is given for entering such order, and it does not appear that any party made application for such an order.

The Justice of the Peace, on December 27, 1938, overruled the defendant's plea of privilege and put the parties to trial on the merits, and entered judgment for the plaintiff.

The defendant appealed to the County Court of Denton County, and, when the cause was heard, the trial court sustained the defendant's plea of privilege and ordered the cause transferred to Dallas County.

From such judgment the plaintiff below has appealed.

The plaintiff, by not complying with the express provisions of Article 2008, Rev. Civ.Statutes, has waived his right to contest the defendant's plea of privilege. Hall v. Butereg Co., Tex.Civ.App., 114 S.W.2d 403; Pyle-Williams & Co. v. De Bord, Tex. Civ.App., 287 S.W. 143; Cochran v. Crow, Tex.Civ.App., 4 S.W.2d 1038; Scruggs v. Gribble, Tex.Civ.App., 41 S.W.2d 643; Commercial Standard Insurance Co. v. Lowrie, Tex.Civ.App., 49 S.W.2d 933; Alpha Petroleum Co....

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • McDaniel v. Gonzalez, 4058.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 27 Febrero 1941
    ...to contest the appellant's plea of privilege. This position is sustained by a number of authorities, among which are Wilson v. J. I. Case Co., Tex.Civ.App., 139 S.W.2d 611; Alpha Petroleum Co. v. Gray, Tex.Civ. App., 103 S.W.2d 1047; Panther Oil & Grease Mfg. Co. v. Crews, Tex.Civ.App., 124......
  • Stripling v. Lakey, 3652.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 28 Marzo 1940
    ... ... McLaurin, of San Augustine, for appellees ...         O'QUINN, Justice ...         This case is before us without brief for ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT