Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Johstoneaux, WINN-DIXIE

Decision Date24 March 1981
Docket NumberWINN-DIXIE,No. 80-1092,80-1092
PartiesSTORES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Carmen JOHSTONEAUX and R. B. Johstoneaux, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Vernis, Bowling, West, Montalto & Goodman and R. David Donlin, Miami, for appellant.

Richard E. Doherty, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Judge.

Mrs. Johstoneaux was robbed and seriously injured by an unknown assailant as she was entering a Winn-Dixie supermarket 1 from the common parking lot of the shopping center where it was located in a "high crime" area of North Miami. 2 She and her husband won a jury verdict and judgment against Winn-Dixie on the theory that it had breached the duty of reasonable care it owes its invitees by failing to provide a guard 3 or other security to protect her from such criminal assaults. Because of the extensive evidence concerning the immediate past history of many similar occurrences in the vicinity, and thus of their future foreseeability, we reject Winn-Dixie's contention that it was entitled to a directed verdict in its favor below. Fernandez v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc., 386 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Holley v. Mt. Zion Terrace Apartments, Inc., 382 So.2d 98 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Pitts v. Metropolitan Dade County, 374 So.2d 996 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). 4

Affirmed.

HENDRY, J., dissents.

1 There is no question of the defendant's duty at the location where the injury took place. See, Shields v. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc., 106 So.2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958), cert. denied, 109 So.2d 168 (Fla.1959).

2 It was described as such by a policeman who patrolled the locality.

3 Although the store had a guard on duty during the evening hours, the incident in question occurred at around 11:00 a. m. when none was present. It was clearly a jury question as to whether reasonable care required that the precautions sometimes taken, and thus impliedly acknowledged as necessary by the store, should have always been in effect. See, Marks v. Delcastillo, 386 So.2d 1259, 1263-64, n.8 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review den., 397 So.2d 778 (Fla.1981); Holley v. Mt. Zion Terrace Apartments, Inc., 382 So.2d 98 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

4 We have not implied either in the cited cases or in this one that when criminal activity is foreseeable it is invariably a jury question as to whether the duty of reasonable care has been discharged. In the case of a mom-and-pop store with one or two employees, for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Lipkin v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • March 6, 2015
    ...of reasonable care includes the duty to protect an invitee from injury from third parties. See, e.g., Winn–Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Johstoneaux, 395 So.2d 599, 599–600 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1981) ; Fernandez v. Miami Jai–Alai, Inc., 386 So.2d 4, 5 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1980) ; Rotbart v. Jordan Marsh Co......
  • Willie v. American Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • May 30, 1989
    ...aff'd, 744 P.2d 43 (Colo.1987); Antrum v. Church's Fried Chicken, 40 Conn.Sup. 343, 499 A.2d 807 (1985); Winn Dixie Stores v. Johstoneaux, 395 So.2d 599 (Fla.App.1981); O'Brien v. Colonial Village, Inc., 119 Ill.App.2d 105, 255 N.E.2d 205 (1970); Parslow v. Pilgrim Parking, 5 Mass.App. 822,......
  • Knight v. Merhige
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 26, 2014
    ...mother-in-law stated that Paul's sister told her “she was afraid that [Paul] was one day going to kill both her and her [other] sister.” 3.Winn–Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Johstoneaux, 395 So.2d 599, 599 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Stevens v. Jefferson, 436 So.2d 33, 34–35 (Fla.1983) (tavern owner);......
  • Antrum v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Superior Court
    • March 28, 1985
    ...for the injuries sustained to an invitee as the result of the criminal acts of a third party. See, e.g., Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Johnstoneaux, 395 So.2d 599 (Fla.App.1981); Fernandez v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc., 386 So.2d 4 (Fla.App.1980); Kraustrunk v. Chicago Housing Authority, 95 Ill.App.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The Psychiatrist's Dilemma: Protect the Public or Safeguard Individual Liberty?
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 11-02, December 1987
    • Invalid date
    ...boarding school for failure to protect student from intruder into his dormitory room). 21. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Johnstoneaux, 395 So.2d 599 (Fla. App. 1981) (action against supermarket for injuries sustained by customer robbed by unknown assailant in common parking lot of shopping cen......
  • Premises liability.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 84 No. 5, May 2010
    • May 1, 2010
    ...vicinity of the defendant's business premises."). Mr. Strickland overlooks the nonresidential Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Johstoneaux, 395 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) ("Because of extensive evidence concerning the immediate past history of many similar occurrences in the vicinity, and thus......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT