Winston v. City of Spokane
Decision Date | 22 August 1895 |
Citation | 12 Wash. 524,41 P. 888 |
Parties | WINSTON v. CITY OF SPOKANE ET AL. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Appeal from superior court, Spokane county; James Z. Moore, Judge.
Action by Patrick H. Winston, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, against the city of Spokane and others. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendants appeal. Reversed.
The foundation of this action was the alleged invalidity of a certain ordinance of the city of Spokane (No. A 583). The superior court found such ordinance to be invalid, and by reason of such finding decreed to plaintiff the relief prayed for in his complaint. The claim that such ordinance was invalid grows out of the fact alleged in the complaint, and admitted in the answer, that the existing indebtedness of the city of Spokane was in excess of the limit authorized by the constitution, and it is not claimed that said ordinance is invalid for any other reason. Such ordinance authorizes the city to enter into a contract with Theis & Barroll for the furnishing of money for the completion of a system of waterworks for the city, and provides for the issuance to them, for the money so advanced, of the obligations of the city payable out of a special fund, to be created by placing therein 60 per cent. of the receipts derived from such waterworks. And it is claimed on the part of the respondent that the entering into of said contract and the issuance of such obligations of the city is the incurring of an indebtedness, within the meaning of the constitution and that to do so at the present time is not within the power of the city, for the reason that it is already indebted beyond the constitutional limit. It will be seen that the sole question presented for our consideration is as to whether or not the ordinance in question, the contract to be executed in pursuance thereof, or the obligations provided for in said contract, will create an indebtedness of the city, within the meaning of the provisions of the constitution in relation thereto. Said ordinance and contract, when construed together, provide that the obligations to be issued in pursuance thereof shall be payable only out of the special fund, to be created out of the receipts of the waterworks as above specified, and that the city shall not be in any manner liable to pay the same except out of moneys in said special fund. For the purposes of this case, it must be conceded that said waterworks will in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gruen v. State Tax Commission
...general credit involving property is not pledged, or where the obligations are to be paid from special assessments. In Winston v. Spokane, 12 Wash. 524, 41 P. 888, 889, court held: 'It will be seen that the sole question presented for our consideration is as to whether or not the ordinance ......
-
McGilvery v. City of Lewiston
... ... This is very common ... in city charters. (Boise Charter, 1907, cc. 10, 11; Lewiston ... Charter, 1907; Freeholders' Charter of Spokane, Act of ... March 24, 1890.) ... Whenever ... the council has determined that the improvement is local in ... its nature, so that ... 431; Quill v. City ... of Indianapolis , 124 Ind. 292, 23 N.E. 788, 7 L. R. A ... 681; 1 Dillon on Municipal Corporations, 477; Winston v ... City of Spokane , 12 Wash. 524, 41 P. 888; Smith v ... City of Seattle , 25 Wash. 300, 65 P. 612; ... Commissioners of Highways of ... ...
-
Alan v. Wayne County
...579, 583. This Court then said that the same reasoning was applicable to 'self-liquidating revenue bonds,' quoting from Winston v. Spokane, 12 Wash. 524, 41 P. 888 (1895) in part as 'The general credit of the city is in no manner pledged, except for the performance of its duty in the creati......
-
State v. City of Miami
... ... 174, 232 P. 655; McClain v. Regents of ... University, 124 Or. 629, 265 P. 412; Barnwell v ... Matthews, 132 S.C. 314, 128 S.E. 712; Winston v ... City of Spokane, 12 Wash. 524, 41 P. 888; Uhler v ... City of Olympia, 87 Wash. 1, 151 P. 117, 152 P. 998; ... Griffin v. City of ... ...
-
Another Day Older and Deeper in Debt: Debt Limitation, the Broad Special Fund Doctrine, and Wppss 4 and 5
...at 44. 34. See generally Williams and Nehemkis, supra note 3. 35. See Bowers, supra note 29, at 47; Bowmar, supra note 1, at 873-74. 36. 12 Wash. 524, 41 P. 888 37. The general credit of the city is in no manner pledged except for the performance of its duty in the creation of such special ......