Winter Park Memorial Hosp. v. Brown, AV-300

Decision Date07 June 1984
Docket NumberNo. AV-300,AV-300
Citation452 So.2d 116
PartiesWINTER PARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and All Risk Corporation of Florida, Appellants, v. Juanita BROWN, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

C. Thomas Ferrara of Ferrara & Smith, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for appellants.

Robert C. Barrett and Robert A. Donahue of Cooper, Rissman, Weisberg & Jeffery, Orlando, for appellee.

SHIVERS, Judge.

The employer/servicing agent in this workers' compensation case appeal the deputy commissioner's order finding claimant's knee injury compensable and denying the employer/servicing agent's notice defense. We affirm.

Claimant injured her right knee on April 26, 1982, when she slipped and fell on a wet kitchen floor while working for her employer as a salad maker. Claimant's fall was witnessed by the employer's head salad maker and a co-employee. The head salad maker called for the kitchen supervisor who thereafter came over and talked with claimant about her injury, although no accident report was filled out. At the time of her injury, claimant's knee felt tender and a little funny, but claimant continued to work since she believed that she had not sustained a serious injury.

Claimant continued to work for the employer for the next several months. During this period of time, however, claimant experienced pain and tenderness in her knee with her knee becoming stiff at times and claimant being unable to kneel due to the pressure such put on her knee. In February of 1983, claimant quit her job with the employer herein when her knee began to swell and cause claimant increasing pain. Claimant went to see her family doctor, Dr. Stephen Van Ore, in connection with this problem.

Shortly after her visit with Dr. Van Ore, in late February or March of 1983, claimant was getting out of a car when her knee "slipped out of place" and then "slipped back into place" as claimant started up the steps to her house. Claimant again went to see Dr. Van Ore who referred claimant to Dr. Joseph Uricchio. Dr. Uricchio operated on claimant's knee for a torn lateral meniscus on April 27, 1983. Dr. Uricchio's office notes indicate that claimant initially related her knee problems to the "knee slipping" incident in February or March of 1983, rather than the "slip and fall" incident at the hospital in April of 1982. Claimant testified that later on she informed Dr. Uricchio, when it "dawned on her", that her knee problems likely were the result of the slip and fall incident at the hospital. Dr. Uricchio did not dispute that claimant might have told him this.

Pursuant to deposition, Dr. Uricchio opined that a slip and fall type of injury would more likely cause a meniscal tear, such as claimant's, than simply putting a leg out of a door to get out of a car. Dr. Uricchio also opined that a knee problem that has been present for a longer period of time would more likely give the decreased tone and atrophy such as was present in claimant's leg, than one that was more recent. Finally, Dr. Uricchio testified that there was no medical evidence to confirm that claimant had dislocated her knee and that it was possible that claimant could have confused her knee slipping incident in 1983 with the locking that occurs in a knee from a meniscal tear.

In his order, the deputy found that claimant's meniscal tear in her knee was more likely caused by claimant's slip and fall at the hospital on April 26, 1982, than the knee slipping incident in 1983; and that the latter had no measurable effect on claimant's knee problem. The deputy further found that claimant's employer received notice of claimant's accident and that, in any event, claimant prosecuted her claim with that degree of diligence that an ordinarily prudent person would have exercised under similar circumstances....

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Edwards v. Caulfield
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 27, 1990
    ...At the outset, we note that notice to a supervisor or foreman is adequate notice to the employer. In Winter Park Memorial Hospital v. Brown, 452 So.2d 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), the claimant, a salad maker, failed to make out a formal accident report because she did not believe she had sustai......
  • Herb's Exxon v. Whatmough
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 29, 1986
    ...medical evidence support the deputy's conclusion of a second accident resulting in the occluded artery. Cf. Winter Park Memorial Hospital v. Brown, 452 So.2d 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Issue two merits further discussion. Section 440.19(2)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1980), All rights for reme......
  • Gregory v. Crum Staffing and Broadspire
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 10, 2009
    ...243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); see also Roseboom v. H.T. Constructors, Inc., 527 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Winter Park Mem'l Hosp. v. Brown, 452 So.2d 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Based on the foregoing, the JCC erroneously concluded Claimant failed to satisfy the actual knowledge exception to t......
  • Roseboom v. H.T. Constructors, Inc., BS-231
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 25, 1988
    ...uncontroverted evidence in this record that the accident occurred in the presence of claimant's foreman. In Winter Park Memorial Hospital v. Brown, 452 So.2d 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), the claimant, a salad maker, failed to make out a formal accident report because she did not believe that sh......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT