Wipo, Inc. v. Cook
Decision Date | 28 April 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 76139,76139 |
Parties | WIPO, INC. v. COOK. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Ronald C. Harrison, Patrick J. Gibbs, Roswell, for appellant.
C. Ray Griffith, Atlanta, for appellee.
John Cook brought an action against A.J. Textiles, Inc. (A.J.) and Wipo, Inc. to recover commissions claimed under a sales representation agreement. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Cook against Wipo, Inc. for $10,000. After denial of its motion for judgment n.o.v., Wipo, Inc. appeals.
1. Appellant contends the trial court erred by denying its motion for judgment n.o.v. because appellee failed to carry his burden of proving damages, and there was no evidence before the jury from which it could properly calculate damages.
The record reveals that in 1982, appellant, a company manufacturing and selling industrial toweling products, formed A.J. as a subsidiary corporation to sell certain linen goods for medical and hospital use. In July 1982 appellee entered into a sales representation agreement with A.J. which provided that he would be its exclusive sales representative and that The agreement further provided that it was terminable by either party upon 30 days written notice to the other party, and that "[u]pon termination notice, commission will be paid on collection of accounts." In December 1985 appellee was given such a 30-day notice of termination by A.J. and it is undisputed that at that time, appellee agreed he would solicit no more orders. Appellee testified at trial he had $450,000 in outstanding orders as of the date of the termination of his employment with A.J. However, when asked on cross-examination: "Do you have any evidence today of this $450,000 dollars that you say was shipped that has been paid to A.J.," appellee answered
" Church's Fried Chicken v. Lewis, 150 Ga.App. 154, 159(1), 256 S.E.2d 916 (1979). Although appellee's testimony and that of Arwood Begor,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
John Thurmond & Associates, Inc. v. Kennedy
...the amount of damages. David Enterprises v. Kingston Atlanta Partners, 211 Ga.App. 108, 111, 438 S.E.2d 90 (1993); Wipo, Inc. v. Cook, 187 Ga.App. 7(1), 369 S.E.2d 306 (1988). In response, the defendant has the burden to present any contradictory evidence challenging the reasonableness or p......
-
Ryland Group v. Daley
...of Warner Robins, 224 Ga. App. 684, 690, 482 S.E.2d 422 (1997). 24. See id. 25. (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wipo v. Cook, 187 Ga.App. 7, 8-9, 369 S.E.2d 306 (1988); David Enterprises v. Kingston Atlanta Partners, 211 Ga.App. 108, 111, 438 S.E.2d 90 26. See footnote 10, supra. ...
-
Lord Jeff Knitting Co., Inc. v. Lacy, A89A2041
...is insufficient evidence to make a 'one way' verdict proper, [directed verdict] should not be awarded.... [Cit.]" Wipo, Inc. v. Cook, 187 Ga.App. 7, 8, 369 S.E.2d 306 (1988). Appellee testified that at the time he left the company he had $20,073.65 and $813,398.22 in outstanding orders for ......
-
ALL ANGLES CONST. & DEMOLITION v. MARTA
...to show the damages, and the plaintiff cannot do this by resorting to "speculation, conjecture and guesswork." Wipo, Inc. v. Cook, 187 Ga.App. 7, 9, 369 S.E.2d 306 (1988). Finally, since All Angles presented a claim for lost salvage, any such recovery under the guise of "acceleration damage......