Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Gordon, 84-1105
| Decision Date | 22 October 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-1105,84-1105 |
| Citation | 127 Wis.2d 71,377 N.W.2d 212 |
| Court | Wisconsin Court of Appeals |
| Parties | WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edwin F. GORDON, Respondent. |
Bronson C. La Follette, Atty. Gen., and John C. Murphy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner-appellant.
Thomas J. Donnelly and David D. Wilmoth, Milwaukee, for respondent.
Before CANE, P.J., and DEAN and LaROCQUE, JJ.
The Wisconsin Department of Revenue appeals a judgment holding that sec. 71.043(2), Stats., permits a sales and use tax credit to be taken against personal income tax. The department contends that the tax credit is available only to corporations. Because we conclude that sec. 71.043(2) does not limit the tax credit to corporations, the judgment is affirmed.
Edwin F. Gordon filed a 1979 nonresident tax return reporting Wisconsin net taxable income of $316,419.36 and a net tax of $30,051.94. Gordon's 1979 income included $473,298.11 generated by his 100% share of the income of Geuder, Paeschke and Frey Company (GPF), a tax-option corporation 1 in which Gordon owned all outstanding stock. On his personal income tax return, Gordon claimed a tax credit of $26,945.83 based on sales taxes paid by GPF. The department disallowed the full amount of the tax credit claimed. On appeal, the Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission reversed, and the circuit court affirmed the decision and order of the commission.
The sole issue in this case is whether a taxpayer who is the only shareholder in a Wisconsin tax-option corporation is entitled to claim the tax credit allowed under sec. 71.043(2) on his personal income tax return. The application of a statute to a set of facts is a question of law. Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. DILHR, 90 Wis.2d 408, 417, 280 N.W.2d 142, 146-47 (1979). When the facts are undisputed and only a question of law is at issue, this court owes no deference to the findings of the Tax Appeals Commission or the circuit court. Department of Revenue v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 108 Wis.2d 553, 556, 322 N.W.2d 528, 529 (Ct.App.1982).
Section 71.043(2) provides in pertinent part that "the tax imposed upon or measured by corporation net income ... pursuant to s. 71.01(1) or (2) may be reduced by an amount equal to the sales and use tax under ch. 77 paid by the corporation." When statutory language is clear and unambiguous this court may not resort to judicial rules of construction, and must arrive at the intention of the legislature by giving the language its ordinary and accepted meaning. Department of Revenue v. Milwaukee Refining Corp., 80 Wis.2d 44, 48, 257 N.W.2d 855, 858 (1977). The language of sec. 71.043(2) is unambiguous. It provides that tax measured by corporation net income can be reduced by the amount of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Unnamed Petitioners v. Connors, 86-0290-W
...that he proceed in a particular case contrary to what he might think best." Id. at 259, 21 N.W.2d 381.8. In Dept. of Revenue v. Gordon, 127 Wis.2d 71, 377 N.W.2d 212 (Ct.App.1985), the court of appeals held that a judge's refusal to allow issuance of complaint under sec. 968.02(3), Stats., ......
-
Bell Atlantic v. Commissioner of Revenue
...decision was "simply wrong." The plaintiffs' counsel went on to point out that in an earlier Wisconsin case, Dept. of Revenue v. Gordon, 127 Wis.2d 71, 74, 377 N.W.2d 212 (1985), the same court had concluded that the same tax credit was available to the sole shareholder of a subchapter S co......
-
Dane County v. Waste Facility Siting Bd., 91-1608
...812, 819 (Ct.App.1984). When courts apply statutes to a sets of facts, they also decide questions of law. DOR v. Gordon, 127 Wis.2d 71, 73, 377 N.W.2d 212, 213 (Ct.App.1985). Courts strive to reach an interpretation that fulfills the statute's objectives rather than one that defeats such go......
-
L & W Const. Co., Inc. v. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue, 88-1524
...624, 625 (Ct.App.1985). Also, the application of a statute to a set of facts is a question of law. Wisconsin Dep't. of Revenue v. Gordon, 127 Wis.2d 71, 73, 377 N.W.2d 212, 213 (Ct.App.1985). When the facts are undisputed and only a question of law is at issue, this court owes no deference ......