Wiseman v. Dyess
Decision Date | 11 June 1934 |
Docket Number | 4-3550 |
Citation | 72 S.W.2d 517,189 Ark. 381 |
Parties | WISEMAN v. DYESS |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; Frank H. Dodge, Chancellor affirmed.
Decree affirmed.
Earl R Wiseman, Hal L. Norwood, Attorney General, and Pat Mehaffy Assistant, for appellant.
Leon B Catlett, for appellee.
This suit was instituted by the Administrator of Federal Emergency Relief in this State to enjoin the State Commissioner of Revenues from collecting a license tax on automobiles, and a tax on gasoline consumed in operating therein, which are used in this State and purchased out of funds made available to the State of Arkansas under the Federal Emergency Relief Act passed by the Congress on March 12, 1933.
The cause was tried under the following agreed statement of facts:
The court held that the automobiles used as stated were the property of the United States Government, and that neither they nor the gasoline used in their operation were subject to taxation, and this appeal is from that decree.
For the reversal of this decree it is insisted that the act of Congress granted the funds spent in this State to the State thereby passing the title to ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. and to Use of Baumann v. Bowles
...Westfall v. United States, 274 U.S. 256, 47 S.Ct. 629; Weston v. City of Charleston, 2 Pet. 449; Ex parte Willman, 277 F. 819; Wiseman v. Dyess, 72 S.W.2d 517. Donald Gunn, Roy McKittrick, Attorney General, and Edward H. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. (1) Not all person......
-
State v. Martin
...States, and not by the state. A case in Arkansas accords with the view here taken. Wiseman, State Commissioner, v. Dyess, Administrator of Emergency Relief, 189 Ark. 381, 72 S.W. (2d) 517. The same case was again before the court, on insistence that the agreed statement of facts, on which t......
- Wiseman v. Dyess, 4-3550.
- Dyess v. Wiseman