Wiseman v. Dyess
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | SMITH, J. |
| Citation | Wiseman v. Dyess, 72 S.W.2d 517, 189 Ark. 381 (Ark. 1934) |
| Decision Date | 11 June 1934 |
| Docket Number | 4-3550 |
| Parties | WISEMAN v. DYESS |
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; Frank H. Dodge, Chancellor affirmed.
Decree affirmed.
Earl R Wiseman, Hal L. Norwood, Attorney General, and Pat Mehaffy Assistant, for appellant.
Leon B Catlett, for appellee.
This suit was instituted by the Administrator of Federal Emergency Relief in this State to enjoin the State Commissioner of Revenues from collecting a license tax on automobiles, and a tax on gasoline consumed in operating therein, which are used in this State and purchased out of funds made available to the State of Arkansas under the Federal Emergency Relief Act passed by the Congress on March 12, 1933.
The cause was tried under the following agreed statement of facts:
The court held that the automobiles used as stated were the property of the United States Government, and that neither they nor the gasoline used in their operation were subject to taxation, and this appeal is from that decree.
For the reversal of this decree it is insisted that the act of Congress granted the funds spent in this State to the State thereby passing the title to the State, and upon becoming State funds were subject to the tax, as the State legislation imposing the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State ex rel. and to Use of Baumann v. Bowles
...Westfall v. United States, 274 U.S. 256, 47 S.Ct. 629; Weston v. City of Charleston, 2 Pet. 449; Ex parte Willman, 277 F. 819; Wiseman v. Dyess, 72 S.W.2d 517. Donald Gunn, Roy McKittrick, Attorney General, and Edward H. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. (1) Not all person......
-
State v. Martin
...States, and not by the state. A case in Arkansas accords with the view here taken. Wiseman, State Commissioner, v. Dyess, Administrator of Emergency Relief, 189 Ark. 381, 72 S.W. (2d) 517. The same case was again before the court, on insistence that the agreed statement of facts, on which t......
- Dyess v. Wiseman