Witkin v. City of New York
| Decision Date | 11 February 1957 |
| Citation | 3 A.D.2d 720,159 N.Y.S.2d 497 |
| Parties | Agnes I. WITKIN and Frank Witkin, Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Michael M. Platzman, New York City, for appellant.
John A. Murray, New York City, for respondent.
Before WENZEL, Acting P. J., and BELDOCK, MURPHY, HALLINAN and KLEINFELD, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action by plaintiff Agnes I. Witkin to recover damages for personal injuries and by her husband for medical expenses and for loss of services, the appeal is (1) from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of the wife for $1,500 and in favor of defendant against the husband, and (2) from so much of an order which on reargument denied a motion for a new trial made pursuant to section 549 of the Civil Practice Act.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Order in so far as appealed from unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Admittedly, at the time of the trial the wife had been residing in Florida for at least eight months with her son by a previous marriage. About a month after the accident, while appellants were still residing together in New York, she named her son as her nearest relative. There was other testimony from which it could be deduced that appellants were not living in 'apparent harmony' at and since the accident, and that the wife had a lucrative business and paid her own expenses. On all the proof herein the jury could properly find that the husband had failed to sustain his burden of proving that he incurred medical expenses in connection with such injuries as it determined were received by the wife as a result of the accident, and of proving that he suffered loss of her services as a consequence of such injuries. Accordingly, there is no inconsistency in the verdict. De Fossez v. Lake George Mar. Industries, 281 App.Div. 1002, 120 N.Y.S.2d 449; Gomes v. Willson & Adams Co., 242 App.Div. 794, 275 N.Y.S. 654; Leonard v. Volz, 190 App.Div. 748, 180 N.Y.S. 607; Gray v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 175 N.Y. 448, 67 N.E. 899, reversing 72 App.Div. 424, 76 N.Y.S. 20, is not to the contrary, for there it was undisputed that the husband and wife were living together in 'apparent harmony' and that such expenses as arose were incurred by the husband. See Louis Gray v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 72 App.Div. 454, 76 N.Y.S. 24.
Assuming that the husband was entitled...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lolik v. Big V Supermarkets Inc.
...to perform services" (7B Warren, Negligence in the New York Courts, Injuries to Wife, § 2.03, at 150-151; see, Witkin v. City of New York, 3 A.D.2d 720, 159 N.Y.S.2d 497). Here, testimony revealed that Lolik's spouse described their preaccident relationship as "bearable" and that they had n......
-
Klein v. Eichen
...their verdict should not be overturned for the reason that they reached a compromise on the extent of damages (Witkin v. City of N.Y., 3 A.D.2d 720(21), 159 N.Y.S.2d 497; Kelekian v. Feinberg, Sup., 118 N.Y.S.2d 641). As in every case, the deliberations of the jurors are secret and are cons......
-
Fairview Hardware, Inc. v. Strausman
...in refusing to fix substantial damages, nor did it commit reversible error in failing to award nominal damages (Witkin v. City of New York, 3 A.D.2d 720, 159 N.Y.S.2d 497; Solof v. Heitner, 282 App.Div. 738, 122 N.Y.S.2d 365; cf. Skinner v. Allison, 54 App.Div. 47, 66 N.Y.S. 288) and an inj......
-
Diamond v. Brower
...be in favor of the plaintiffs for six cents. That circumstances however does not fatally taint the verdicts. In Witkin v. City of New York (3 A.D.2d 720, 159 N.Y.S.2d 497) the jury found in favor of the wife and gave her damages for her personal injuries and at the same time found 'in favor......