Wolford v. PINNACOL ASSUR.

Decision Date22 May 2003
Citation81 P.3d 1079
Docket Number01CA2415
PartiesCharlene WOLFORD, n/k/a Charlene Pribble, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PINNACOL ASSURANCE, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Dami Hospitality, LLC v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office of Colo.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • February 23, 2017
    ...to the constitutional prohibition against excessive fines. See Associated Bus. Prods. , 126 P.3d at 326 ; Wolford v. Pinnacol Assurance , 81 P.3d 1079, 1084 (Colo. App. 2003), rev'd on other grounds , 107 P.3d 947 (Colo. 2005). The Eighth Amendment provides that "[e]xcessive bail shall not ......
  • In re Marriage of Malwitz
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • October 4, 2004
  • Assoc. Bus. Products v. Indus. Claim Office
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • November 3, 2005
    ...However, the Eighth Amendment and Colo. Const. art. II, § 20 prohibit the imposition of "excessive fines." Wolford v. Pinnacol Assurance, 81 P.3d 1079 (Colo.App.2003), rev'd on other grounds, 107 P.3d 947 Once the right to impose a fine has been proved, the party upon whom the fine is levie......
  • Wolford v. Pinnacol Assurance
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • February 28, 2005
    ...the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of respondent, Pinnacol Assurance (Pinnacol). See Wolford v. Pinnacol Assurance, 81 P.3d 1079 (Colo.App.2003). This case was initiated by Wolford against Pinnacol in the civil division of the Denver District Court (the district court) ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT