Wolpert v. Knight, 4108
Decision Date | 24 October 1958 |
Docket Number | No. 4108,4108 |
Citation | 330 P.2d 1023,74 Nev. 322 |
Parties | Eugene B. WOLPERT, Appellant, v. Ralph KNIGHT, Respondent. |
Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
Jon R. Collins, Ely, for appellant.
E. R. Miller, Jr., Ely, for respondent.
Knight recovered a judgment for $2,000 against Wolpert on his complaint based on Wolpert's check for $2,500 issued and delivered by Wolpert to Knight to take up five earlier $500 checks. Wolpert pleaded as a special defense that the check was given in consideration of a gambling debt. The court's finding against this contention is amply supported by the record, which, without contradiction, shows that on each of four occasions at which Knight cashed Wolpert's $500 check, Wolpert was not indebted to Knight. A fifth $500 check was executed by Wolpert at the gambling table and delivered to the dealer for which the dealer gave Wolpert $500 in chips which Wolpert proceeded to play at the table.
The contention presented on Wolpert's appeal from the judgment is that the $2,500 check, as well as all of the earlier $500 checks taken up thereby, were nullities by reason of the provision that any such bill, note or security given 'for the reimbursing or repaying any money knowingly lent or advanced at the time and place of such play, to any person or persons so gaming or betting as aforesaid, or that shall, during such play, so play or bet, shall be utterly void, frustrate and of none effect * * *.' Statute of Anne, Section 1, adopted into the law of this state as part of the common law of England. West Indies v. First National Bank, 67 Nev. 13, 214 P.2d 144. Our conclusion is that the contention is not well founded, and we turn to the record to determine the circumstances under which each check was cashed.
Respondent operated the Townclub, a cafe, bar and casino, in Ely. On four different occasions, over a period of three days, appellant went to the cashier's desk at the Townclub and asked if they would cash his check. On each occasion he did so. Knight was asked on cross examination:
'Q. Isn't it true, Mr. Knight, when Mr. Wolpert would gamble and come back, or he would build up a debt, then you would give him more money? A. That is not true.
'Q. Now the money he got from you for the checks, he would use it for gambling? A. No, sir, he would not. That is not a true statement. I say Mr. Wolpert used part of it for gambling but how much I don't know. * * * When he got money from me, at times he would go to the bar and drink or buy drinks at the bar for others, then he would leave and I presume go to the corner for awhile, then come back. * * * 'Q. Isn't it true you gave him money so he would gamble? A. I did not, that is not true.
On each occasion when Wolpert asked Knight to cash his check he owed Knight no money at all. On the last occasion Wolpert bought $500 in chips. It was for this item of $500 that the court denied him a judgment. Knight further testified:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Flamingo Resort, Inc. v. United States
...for a gambling purpose is justifiable from such circumstances." Craig v. Harrah, 66 Nev. at 6, 201 P.2d at 1084. In Wolpert v. Knight, 74 Nev. 322, 330 P.2d 1023 (1958), the defendant issued a $2,500 check to cover five previously issued $500 checks, four of which had been cashed at the cas......
-
National Recovery Systems v. Mazzei
...not for some other legitimate purpose (National Recovery Systems v. Wonder, 118 Misc.2d 1098, 462 N.Y.S.2d 107; see e.g., Wolpert v. Knight, 74 Nev. 322, 330 P.2d 1023; Flamingo Resort, Inc. v. United States, 485 F.Supp. 926, affd. 664 F.2d 1387 [9th Cir.1982] ). Defendant's conclusory stat......
-
Hotel Riviera, Inc. v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
...Inc. v. Herrmann, 96 Nev. 574, 613 P.2d 413 (1980); Corbin v. O'Keefe, 87 Nev. 189, 484 P.2d 565 (1971) (per curiam); Wolpert v. Knight, 74 Nev. 322, 330 P.2d 1023 (1958); Weisbrod v. Fremont Hotel Inc., 74 Nev. 227, 326 P.2d 1104 (1958); West Indies, Inc. v. First National Bank of Nevada, ......
-
National Recovery Systems v. Nemchik
...14 Pa. 18, 20 (1850). See also Wolpert v. Knight, 74 Nev. 322, 330 P.2d 1023 (1958); Craig v. Harrah, 66 Nev. 1, 201 P.2d 1081 (1949). The Wolpert case is instructive in this regard. In defendant issued a series of five $ 500 checks to plaintiff who ran a bar and gambling establishment in E......