Wolverine Insurance Company v. Phillips
Decision Date | 12 August 1958 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 1015. |
Citation | 165 F. Supp. 335 |
Parties | WOLVERINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Toy National Bank, and Loren Mahoney, Plaintiffs, v. V. Lee PHILLIPS, District Director of Internal Revenue, and United States of America, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa |
Charles F. Stilwill and Kenneth T. Wilson, Sioux City, Iowa, for plaintiffs.
F. E. Van Alstine, U. S. Dist. Atty., and Theodore G. Gilinsky, Asst. U. S. Dist. Atty., for defendants.
The controversy in this case is between a surety on the bond of a defaulting building contractor and the Government as the holder of tax liens against such contractor as to the sum of $10,168.46 being held in escrow.
On May 26, 1955, Mr. and Mrs. Loren H. Mahoney, hereinafter referred to as Owner, entered into a contract with Ericsson and Kochen, hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, relating to the construction of a residence in Sioux City, Iowa. That contract contained, among other provisions, the following:
The specifications, as noted, are made a part of the contract. One paragraph of the specifications provides as follows:
On July 20, 1955, the Contractor made application to the Wolverine Insurance Company for a bond. That Company will be hereinafter referred to as the Surety. In certain provisions of the application the Contractor is referred to as the Indemnitor and the Surety as the Company. Paragraph VIII of the application provides, in part, as follows:
"That the Indemnitor * * * further agrees in the event of any breach or default on his part in any of the provisions of the contract and/or bond that the said Company shall be subrogated to all the rights and properties of the Indemnitor in such contract, including deferred and reserved payments, current and earned estimates and final payments, and any and all moneys and securities that may be due and payable at the time of such default * * * or that may thereafter become due and payable on account of said contract * * *."
On July 22, 1955, the following bond was issued:
The Contractor commenced the construction of the residence in the summer of 1955. On July 26, 1955, the Owner paid the Contractor the sum of $10,305.91 as a progress payment and on October 5, 1955, the Owner paid the Contractor the sum of $10,263 as a further progress payment. Later a number of parties filed mechanics' liens against the property. It does not appear that the progress payments were paid to those parties, except that the sum of $1,000 was paid to one of them.
On November 15, 1955, the Government made an assessment against the Contractor for federal taxes in the amount of $5,168.27. On December 15, 1955, a Government tax lien for that amount was filed in Woodbury County, Iowa.
Under the terms of the contract the residence was to be completed by December 1, 1955. At that date the residence was still incomplete. The house was finally completed and accepted by the Owner on May 24, 1956. In February 1956, while the residence was still uncompleted, there were a number of claims for materials and labor furnished for the residence which were unpaid. Starting on February 3, 1956, a large number of mechanics' liens were filed against the property. The Owner made demand upon the Surety to perform under its bond in connection with those liens. On February 12, 1956, the Government made an assessment against the Contractor for federal taxes in the amount of $2,950.64. On February 13, 1956, a Government tax lien for that amount was filed in Woodbury County, Iowa. On February 20, 1956, the Government made an assessment against the Contractor for federal taxes in the amount of $1,764.20. On February 21, 1956, a Government tax lien for that amount was filed in Woodbury County, Iowa. Three notices of levy for parts of the above taxes were duly served upon the Owner on January 24, April 23, and May 3, 1956. On February 23, 1956, the Contractor executed the following assignment to the Surety:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
WT JONES AND COMPANY v. Foodco Realty, Inc.
...liens of themselves, when no steps have been taken to enforce them, are not specific and choate. As said in Wolverine Insurance Co. v. Phillips, D.C., 165 F.Supp. 335, at p. 346: "It is well settled that an unforeclosed mechanics' lien even though filed prior to a Government tax lien will b......
-
United States v. Chapman, 6108.
...Company of America v. Ted Price Construction Company, D.C. Idaho 1959, 175 F.Supp. 261, 263; Wolverine Insurance Company v. Phillips, D.C.N.D.Iowa 1958, 165 F.Supp. 335, 353 et seq.; and, Central Surety and Insurance Corporation v. Martin Infante Co., D.C.N.J.1958, 164 F.Supp. 923, 927, aff......
-
United States v. Menier Hardware No. 1, Inc.
...of the American Law Institute and American Bar Association (July, 1961). See, also, cases cited in Wolverine Insurance Company v. Phillips (D.C. 1958), 165 F.Supp. 335, 345, and Beeghly v. Wilson (D.C.1957), 152 F.Supp. 726, 734. In the present case, as heretofore noted, the plaintiff as ag......
-
Randall v. Colby
...law relating to Federal tax liens. This Court considered certain phases of Federal tax liens in the cases of Wolverine Insurance Company v. Phillips, D. C.1958, 165 F.Supp. 335, appeal dismissed, 8 Cir., 1960, 283 F.2d 518; Noltze Motor Company v. Burrows-Moore Pontiac, D.C.1958, 157 F.Supp......