Wood v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | Wood v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, 283 P.2d 688, 45 Wn.2d 601 (Wash. 1955) |
| Decision Date | 09 May 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 32633 |
| Parties | William P. WOOD, Respondent, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Appellant. |
Appeal from Superior Court, King County; Mitchell G. Kalin, Judge.
Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann, Altha P. Curry, Seattle, for appellant.
Clark A. Eckart, Woodrow L. Taylor, Seattle, Deah H. Eastman, Roscoe Krier, Seattle, Dean H. Eastman, Roscoe Krier, Seattle, amici curiae.
John H. Kirkwood, Jr. John W. Schumacher, Aberdeen, for respondent.
Upon a rehearing en Banc, a majority of the court adheres to the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein, and reported in Wash., 277 P.2d 345.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Bauman by Chapman v. Crawford
...not given notice that his actions were in violation of the law, Wood v. Chicago, M., St. P. & Pac. R.R., 45 Wash.2d 601, 277 P.2d 345, 283 P.2d 688 (1954). As the Wood court stated, "[a]n analysis of the above cases indicates a reluctance by this court to impose liability by finding neglige......
-
U.S. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
... ... Dernac v. Pacific Coast Coal Co., 110 Wash. 138, 188 P. 15, 17 ... In Wood v. Chicago, Mil., St. Paul & Pac. R. Co., 45 ... ...
-
Mitchell v. Emblade
...Comfort v. Penner, 166 Wash. 177, 6 P.2d 604; Wood v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. Co., 45 Wash.2d 601, 277 P.2d 345, 283 P.2d 688. He has a right to presume it was legally placed. In the event there be any legal irregularity in establishing such signs, absent other conditions ......
-
Mulkey v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.
...(1956), 48 Wash.2d 145, 291 P.2d 1023; Wood v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad (1954), 45 Wash.2d 601, 277 P.2d 345, 283 P.2d 688; Williams v. Hofer (1948), 30 Wash.2d 253, 191 P.2d We review the evidence with this rule in mind. Mr. and Mrs. Mulkey operated a bean farm. Betw......
Get Started for Free
