Wood v. Hallenbarter
Decision Date | 27 February 1942 |
Docket Number | 28527. |
Citation | 12 Wn.2d 576,122 P.2d 798 |
Parties | WOOD et al. v. HALLENBARTER. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Department 2.
Action to recover damages sustained in an automobile collision by D B. Wood and another against Louis Hallenbarter, wherein defendant filed a cross-complaint. From an order granting a new trial to defendant after verdict in defendant's favor but allowing no damages, plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed.
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County; E. D. Hodge, Judge.
George Bovingdon, of Seattle, and James V Ramsdell, of Tacoma, for appellants.
A. O Burmeister and E. F. Freeman, both of Tacoma, Shank, Belt, Rode & Cook, of Seattle, and Martin L. Potter, of Tacoma, for respondent.
This action grows out of a collision which occurred August 8, 1940, on the Tacoma-Sumner highway, between a loaded logging truck and trailer owned by plaintiffs and driven by plaintiff D. B. Wood and a Plymouth sedan owned and driven by defendant, Hallenbarter. The truck was traveling westerly toward Tacoma; the sedan, easterly toward Sumner. The accident occurred on a curve. After the collision, the sedan came to rest in the middle of the highway, and the truck and trailer, with its load, came to rest in a field on the southerly side of the highway; in other words, the truck and trailer went off the road on the side to its left.
Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover for damage to the truck and trailer and for loss of its use while being repaired. They charged defendant with negligence in several particulars, among which was that, just Before and at the time of collision, he was driving on the wrong (his left) side of the road. Defendant answered and, by way of cross-complaint, sought damages for injuries to himself and his car. Among other charges of negligence made by him was that the truck was being driven on the wrong (its left) side of the road. The cause was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in form for defendant but allowing him no damages. He interposed a motion for new trial, which was granted 'upon the ground that substantial justice has not been done in this case by the verdict of the jury.' From the order granting new trial, plaintiffs appeal.
In Getty v. Hutton, 110 Wash. 429, 188 P. 497, this court said:
Appellants have cited a number of cases in which this court has sustained orders denying motions for new trial upon conflicting evidence--implying, as we infer, that, if it is not an abuse of discretion to deny a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Clark v. Quality Dairy Co.
...v. Brunton, 147 Cal.App.2d 43, 304 P.2d 1028, 1031(1, 2); Johnson v. City of Ilwaco, 38 Wash.2d 408, 229 P.2d 878; Wood v. Hallenbarter, 12 Wash.2d 576, 122 P.2d 798; Spaziano v. Raponi, 65 R.I. 163, 13 A.2d 810, 812(2--4); Buckeye Irrigation Co. v. Askren, 45 Ariz. 566, 46 P.2d 1068; Moone......
-
Cabe v. Department of Labor and Industries, 31150.
... ... 1, 44 P.2d 771; Corbaley v. Pierce ... County, 192 Wash. 688, 74 P.2d 993; Nagle v ... Powell, 5 Wash.2d 215, 105 P.2d 1; Wood v ... Hallenbarter, 12 Wash.2d 576, 122 P.2d 798; Bond v ... Ovens, 20 Wash.2d 354, 147 P.2d 514; Yocum v ... Department of ... ...
-
Cabe v. Department of Labor and Industries
... ... 1, 44 P.2d 771; Corbaley v. Pierce County, 192 Wash ... 688, 74 P.2d 993; Nagle v. Powell, 5 Wash.2d 215, ... 105 P.2d 1; Wood v. Hallenbarter, 12 Wash.2d 576, ... 122 P.2d 798; Bond v. Ovens, 20 Wash.2d 354, 147 ... P.2d 514; Yocum v. Department of Labor & ... ...
-
Barefield v. Barefield, 38467
...P.2d 158; Nagle v. Powell, 5 Wash.2d 215, 105 P.2d 1; Griffin v. Cascade Theatres Corp., 10 Wash.2d 574, (117 P.2d 651; Wood v. Hallenbarter, 12 Wash.2d 576, 122 P.2d 798. In a number of the cases just cited it is also declared that ordinarily a much stronger showing of abuse of discretion ......