Wood v. Ray-Al Cafe, Inc., RAY-AL
| Decision Date | 04 June 1965 |
| Docket Number | RAY-AL |
| Citation | 208 N.E.2d 225,349 Mass. 766 |
| Parties | Thomas WOOD v.CAFE, INC. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Sturtevant Burr, Boston (Richard W. Hynes, Dorchester, with him), for defendant.
Harry Kisloff, Boston (Peter J. Need-ham, Boston, with him), for plaintiff.
Before WILKINS, C. J., and SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER and KIRK, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
The denial of the defendant's motions for a directed verdict and for the entry of a verdict for the defendant under leave reserved was right. The testimony tended to show that a bartender, employed by the defendant in its cafe, served the plaintiff's assailant with liquor for some time after he was obviously intoxicated and in a period when he was moving about the cafe imposing himself on patrons, cadging drinks from them, and in the course of this action using abusive or insulting language. There was also testimony that the assault on the plaintiff, a patron, came after the plaintiff had asked the bartender to eject the offender. Such conduct by a drunken person carried with it the menace of violence. Failure to protect the plaintiff from this menace could have been found to be a breach of the duty owed to him. McFadden v. Bancroft Hotel Corp., 313 Mass. 56, 59-60, 46 N.E.2d 573. Kane v. Fields Corner Grille, Inc., 341 Mass. 640, 641-643, 171 N.E.2d 287. There was also evidence of negligence in the serving of liquor to an intoxicated person in violation of G.L. c. 138, § 69. This violation could have been found to be a contributing cause of the injury. See Monroe v. Vassalotti, 340 Mass. 764, 766, 166 N.E.2d 696; Falvey v. Hamelburg, 347 Mass. 430, 434-435, 198 N.E.2d 400.
Exceptions overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Adamian v. Three Sons, Inc.
...of § 69, there could have been liability. See Kane v. Fields Corner Grille, Inc., 341 Mass. 640, 171 N.E.2d 287; Wood v. Ray-Al Cafe, Inc., 349 Mass. 766, 208 N.E.2d 225. The issue is whether a different result must be reached as matter of law where damage occurs outside those premises to m......
-
Westerback v. Harold LeClair Co.
...is where injuries result from the acts of drunken patrons on premises, whether the drunk inflicts the injuries, as in Wood v. Ray-Al Cafe, Inc., 349 Mass. 766, 766 (1965); Carey v. New Yorker of Worcester, Inc., 355 Mass. at 451-452; and Sweenor v. 162 State St., Inc., 361 Mass. 524, 525-52......
-
O'Hanley v. Ninety-Nine, Inc., NINETY-NIN
...774 (1970); Wiska v. St. Stanislaus Social Club, Inc., 7 Mass.App. 813, 816, 390 N.E.2d 1133 (1979). See also Wood v. Ray-Al Cafe, Inc., 349 Mass. 766, 208 N.E.2d 225 (1965); Adamian v. Three Sons, Inc., 353 Mass. 498, 499, 233 N.E.2d 18 (1968); Carey v. New Yorker of Worcester, Inc., 355 M......
-
Bennett v. Eagle Brook Country Store, Inc.
...See Three Sons, Inc., 357 Mass. at 275, 257 N.E.2d 774; Wiska, 7 Mass.App.Ct. at 816, 390 N.E.2d 1133. See also Wood v. Ray-Al Cafe, Inc., 349 Mass. 766, 208 N.E.2d 225 (1965); Carey, 355 Mass. at 453, 245 N.E.2d 420. We conclude that in the present circumstances the jury properly could inf......