Wood v. State, 56186
| Decision Date | 14 September 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 56186,56186 |
| Citation | 248 S.E.2d 337,147 Ga.App. 232 |
| Parties | WOOD v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Wiggins & Camp, Daniel P. Camp, Carrollton, for appellant.
William F. Lee, Jr., Dist. Atty., Michael G. Kam, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Wood was convicted of burglary. The facts, viewed most favorably toward upholding the verdict, show that Wood was apprehended approximately six hundred feet from the scene of a wrecked vehicle owned by an acquaintance of Wood's. Inside the vehicle were various articles which appeared to be the same as those stolen from a local convenience store approximately one hour earlier. Wood, at the time of apprehension, had a recent cut on his nose, dirt in his hair, and gasoline on his clothes. This evidence, solely circumstantial in nature, was insufficient to authorize a conviction for burglary, notwithstanding the fact that it was not inconsistent with a theory of guilt. In order to sustain a conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence, the evidence must exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the defendant. See Mealor v. State, 134 Ga.App. 564, 215 S.E.2d 272; Rutland v. State, 129 Ga.App. 313, 199 S.E.2d 595. Accordingly, the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict of acquittal in favor of Wood.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Muckle v. State
...it did not place defendant at the scene of the crime. See O'Quinn v. State, 153 Ga.App. 467, 470-472(2), 265 S.E.2d 824; Wood v. State, 147 Ga.App. 232, 248 S.E.2d 337. The most damaging evidence is defendant's flight, but flight is generally not sufficient to support a conviction even if t......
-
Patterson v. State, 59623
...case, the evidence must be such as to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Wood v. State, 147 Ga.App. 232, 248 S.E.2d 337 (1978). In our view, the evidence meets this Appellant was observed at the burglarized premises, prying on the front door and "peek......
-
Hatcher v. State
...save that of his guilt. See generally OCGA § 24-4-6; Muckle v. State, 165 Ga.App. 873 (1), 303 S.E.2d 54 (1983); Wood v. State, 147 Ga.App. 232, 248 S.E.2d 337 (1978). However, we note that direct evidence of appellant's guilt was presented in the form of testimony that the eyewitness had p......
-
Hall v. State, 59963
...other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Woodall v. State, 235 Ga. 525, 532, 221 S.E.2d 794; Wood v. State, 147 Ga.App. 232, 248 S.E.2d 337. The evidence must be inconsistent with his innocence of the crime charged. As was said in Williams v. State, supra, 113 Ga. ......