Wood v. State

Decision Date27 September 1994
Docket NumberNo. A94A1424,A94A1424
Citation214 Ga.App. 848,449 S.E.2d 308
PartiesWOOD v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Lorie A. Moss, Calhoun, for appellant.

Stephen F. Lanier, Dist. Atty., Lisa W. Pettit, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

JOHNSON, Judge.

Carol Wood appeals the denial of her motion to suppress and subsequent conviction on one count of possession of amphetamines. Wood was arrested after a search of her home conducted by the Rome/Floyd Metro Task Force, pursuant to a search warrant, yielded a plastic bag containing amphetamine residue. She asserts that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress because the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not establish probable cause.

1. The affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued stated that a reliable informant related to the affiant that he had been told by an unidentified third-party that he had seen methamphetamines at Wood's home. According to the affidavit, the reliable informant told the officer that this unidentified third-party did not know that he would be passing the information along to the police. The reliable informant had no independent knowledge of these facts, but stated that his source "had no reason to lie" to him. Compare State v. Law, 208 Ga.App. 744, 432 S.E.2d 110 (1993), in which the informant actually saw the contraband but a third-party identified it as such for him.

"In determining whether an affidavit sufficiently establishes the probable cause necessary for issuance of a warrant, we employ the totality of the circumstances analysis enunciated in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (103 SC 2317, 76 LE2d 527) (1983), and adopted by [the Georgia Supreme Court] in State v. Stephens, 252 Ga. 181 (311 SE2d 823) (1984), with the admonition that prudence counsels that Gates be considered as the outer limit of probable cause. Under that analysis, the task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. And the duty of a reviewing court is simply to ensure that the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed. In addition, [the Georgia Supreme Court] has cautioned attesting officers and magistrates to make every effort to see that supporting affidavits reflect the maximum indication of reliability." (Citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Gary v. State, 262 Ga. 573, 577, 422 S.E.2d 426 (1992).

The facts surrounding the affidavit upon which the magistrate relied in issuing the search warrant in this case are similar to those in Munson v. State, 211 Ga.App. 80, 438 S.E.2d 123 (1993), in which this court noted: "[T]he 'totality of the circumstances' analysis applies also in situations in which there are two informers." Id. at 81, 438 S.E.2d 123. A deficiency created by the fact that the reliability of either source has not been established can be corrected by the corroboration of the information, thereby providing a substantial basis for finding probable cause. Id. at 82, 438 S.E.2d 123. In Munson the affiant corrected the deficiency by conducting an independent investigation of the information, verifying not only Munson's address, but also by involving another law enforcement agency which further investigated and confirmed that marijuana was growing at the location indicated by the informant. The affiant in this case, however, did nothing more to corroborate the information of the reliable informant than to confirm Wood's address, the make of her car and her hair color. Nothing whatsoever was done to corroborate the unidentified third-party's information. These steps, which merely verified Wood's identity but did not tie her to the commission of any crime, do not constitute corroboration so as to cure the deficiency created by the affiant's reliance on information from a source whose reliability had not been established. No matter how truthful or sincere the information from the reliable source, the crucial question is the unidentified third-party's reliability, and that is simply not established in the affidavit. " 'Our decisions applying the totality of circumstances analysis have consistently recognized the value of corroboration of details of an informant's tip by independent police work.' [Cit.]" (Punctuation omitted.) State v. Stephens, 252 Ga. 181, 183, 311 S.E.2d 823 (1984). In this case, the independent investigation done by the police in an effort to corroborate the information was insufficient. See Davis v. State, 214 Ga.App. 36, 447 S.E.2d 68 (1994).

We acknowledge that in doubtful or marginal cases preference should be afforded to upholding the warrant. Mincey v. State, 180 Ga.App. 898, 900, 350 S.E.2d 852 (1986). Nonetheless, we find here that the uncorroborated statement of an unnamed third-party source, as filtered through a reliable informant to a police affiant, did not give rise to probable cause sufficient to support the issuance of a search warrant. The trial court erred in denying Wood's motion to suppress.

2. In light of our holding in Division 1 above, we need not address Wood's remaining enumerations of error.

Judgment reversed.

McMURRAY and BEASLEY, P.JJ., and BLACKBURN, SMITH and RUFFIN, JJ., concur.

POPE, C.J., BIRDSONG, P.J., and ANDREWS, J., dissent.

ANDREWS, Judge, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent as I believe the warrant is supported by probable cause. Although the majority purports to apply the totality of circumstances analysis, it bases its decision solely on the fact that the unidentified third-party's reliability is not established by the affidavit or otherwise. However, under the totality of circumstances analysis, the issuing magistrate is to make a practical, common-sense decision whether...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Sutton v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 25 janvier 2013
    ...corroboration of the information, thereby providing a substantial basis for probable cause.” (Citation omitted.) Wood v. State, 214 Ga.App. 848, 849(1), 449 S.E.2d 308 (1994). However, “for the corroboration to be meaningful, the [corroborating] information must include a range of details r......
  • Wiggins v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 23 mars 2015
    ...when the affidavit failed to provide any reason to believe that the information was from a credible source); Wood v. State, 214 Ga.App. 848, 849(1), 449 S.E.2d 308 (1994) (finding that “the uncorroborated statement of an unnamed third-party source, as filtered through a reliable informant t......
  • Powers v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 16 mai 2003
    ...State, 232 Ga.App. 274, 275, 501 S.E.2d 603 (1998); Caswell v. State, 219 Ga.App. 787-788, 466 S.E.2d 907 (1996); Wood v. State, 214 Ga.App. 848-849(1), 449 S.E.2d 308 (1994); Langford v. State, 213 Ga.App. 232, 233(1), 444 S.E.2d 153 (1994); Eaton v. State, 210 Ga.App. 273(1), 435 S.E.2d 756 ...
  • State v. Wesson
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 28 avril 1999
    ...the probable cause necessary for issuance of a warrant, we consider the totality of the circumstances. Wood v. State, 214 Ga.App. 848, 849(1), 449 S.E.2d 308 (1994). In cases such as this one, where there are two informants, a deficiency created by the fact that the reliability of either so......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Criminal Law and Procedure: a Two-year Survey - James P. Fleissner
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 48-1, September 1996
    • Invalid date
    ...422. Id. at 39, 447 S.E.2d at 71 (Andrews, J., dissenting). 423. Id. at 38, 447 S.E.2d at 71. 424. Id. at 38-39, 447 S.E.2d at 71. 425. 214 Ga. App. 848, 449 S.E.2d 308 (1994). 426. Id. at 848, 449 S.E.2d at 309. 427. Id. 428. Id. 429. Id. at 849, 449 S.E.2d at 310. 430. Id. 431. Id. at 848......
  • Workers' Compensation - H. Michael Bagley, Daniel C. Kniffen, John G. Blackmon, Jr., and Phillip Comer Griffeth
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 47-1, September 1995
    • Invalid date
    ...450 S.E.2d at 850. 147. Id. 148. Id. 149. Id. at 379, 450 S.E.2d at 851. 150. 214 Ga. App. 829, 449 S.E.2d 307 (1994). 151. Id. at 829, 449 S.E.2d at 308. 152. Id. 153. Id. 154. Id. 155. 214 Ga. App. 825, 449 S.E.2d 170 (1994). 156. Id. at 825, 449 S.E.2d at 171. 157. Id. at 826, 449 S.E.2d......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT