Woodall v. First Nat. Bank of Columbus, 43788
Decision Date | 18 September 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 43788,No. 3,43788,3 |
Parties | Janette M. WOODALL v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF COLUMBUS, Executor, et al |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Bloch, Hall, Hawkins & Owens, Charles J. Bloch, Wilbur D. Owens, Jr., Macon, Foley, Chappell, Hollis & Schloth, William H. Young, III, Columbus, for appellant.
Kelly, Champion & Henson, John W. Denney, J. Norman Pease, Ray L. Allison, Forrest L. Champion, Jr., Columbus, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
The widow of Allen M. Woodall applied to the court of ordinary in Muscogee County for a second year's support, and on objection by the executor of the estate and others that debts owed by the estate were still unpaid, the ordinary dismissed the application. She appealed to the superior court, and a judge of that court sustained a motion of the executor and others for summary judgment. She appeals from this order. Held:
1. There is no merit in the contention of the widow that an application for a second year's support, on appeal to a superior court, is not subject to a motion for summary judgment. Without deciding whether such a motion would be cognizable in a court of ordinary as a court of record to which the Civil Practice Act applies (but see §§ 1, 81, Civil Practice Act; Ga.L.1966, pp. 609, 610, 668; 1967, pp. 226, 241; 1968, pp. 1104, 1109; Code Ann. §§ 81A-101, 81A-181) the appeal in the superior court is a de novo investigation (Code § 6-501) and although the powers of the superior court on the merits are no broader than those of the court of ordinary (Goodman v. Little, 213 Ga. 178, 97 S.E.2d 567), the appeal is subject to the established procedures for civil actions (see Hall v. First National Bank of Atlanta, 85 Ga.App. 498(3), 69 S.E.2d 679) thus entitling a party to invoke the summary judgment procedure ( § 56(c) Civil Practice Act; Ga.L.1966, [118 Ga.App. 441] pp. 609, 660; Code Ann. § 81A-156(c)). See, in this connection, § 86(b) of the Civil Practice Act as amended in 1968; Ga.L.1968, pp. 1104, 1109; § 81, as amended, cited supra.
2. The caveators show without dispute that the estate has been kept together for more than a year, and that in addition to unpaid obligations secured by two pieces of real estate, the estate has outstanding obligations for executor's fees, attorney's fees for representing the estate, funds borrowed by the executor in the exercise of authority under the will, and interest thereon, to pay estate taxes, first year's support, and other purposes, ad valorem taxes due the City of Columbus, Muscogee County, Glynn County, Intangible taxes, and income taxes due the State of Georgia, and income taxes due the United States.
Code § 113-1004 authorizes a second or subsequent year's support to the widow out of an estate held together for more than a year, if 'there are no debts to pay.' In Martin v. Gaissert, 139 Ga. 693, 78 S.E. 40, the Supreme Court expressly rejected the dictum in Woodbridge v. Woodbridge, 70 Ga. 733, 735, that even if there are debts to pay, the widow may have another year's support if there is still enough left over to supply her wants. Passing by the obligations secured by real estate, as to which limitations in the will may affect payment from the funds of the estate generally, we are of the opinion that the remaining obligations are 'debets to pay' which bar the grant of a second's year support to the widow out of the estate. Colyer v. Huntley, 179 Ga. 332, 335, 175 S.E. 901, 902, 95 A.L.R. 1140. Georgia Power Company v. Davis, 43 Ga.App. 791, 794, 160 S.E. 690, 691. All taxes due the State or the United States are...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brown v. Frachiseur
...same procedural rules apply in a de novo review as in any other civil case before the trial court. See Woodall v. First National Bank of Columbus, 118 Ga.App. 440, 164 S.E.2d 361 (1968). Thus, where the probate court record is properly before the superior court (see Code Ann. § 6-501), it m......
-
Taylor v. Donaldson, 26416
...that summary judgment is an available remedy upon appeal in the Superior Court of a year's support proceeding. Woodall v. First National Bank, 118 Ga.App. 440, 164 S.E.2d 361. The answer to this question requires interpretation of a salient provision of the Civil Practice Act (Ga.L.1966, p.......
-
Bright v. Knecht, 74204
...the established procedures for civil actions ..., thus entitling a party to invoke summary judgment." Woodall v. First Nat. Bank of Columbus, 118 Ga.App. 440(1), 164 S.E.2d 361 (1968). Accord Savannah Valley, etc., Assn. v. Cheek, 161 Ga.App. 365, 367(1), 288 S.E.2d 633 (1982). See Taylor v......
-
Baker v. Baker
...Year's Support, § 20; 40 Mercer Law Rev., Wills, Trusts & Administration of Estates, § 2. A., p. 475. In Woodall v. First Nat. Bank, etc., 118 Ga.App. 440, 441(2), 164 S.E.2d 361, "the estate [had] outstanding obligations for executor's fees, attorney's fees for representing the estate, fun......