Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Reese
Decision Date | 20 December 1943 |
Docket Number | No. 7170.,7170. |
Citation | 176 S.W.2d 708 |
Parties | WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INS. SOC. v. REESE et al. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Howard County; Minor W. Millwee, Judge.
Action by Martha Lou Reese and another, by Ressie L. Reese, guardian, against Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society to recover on a certificate of life insurance. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Rainey T. Wells, of Omaha, Neb., and Jas. S. McConnell, of Nashville, for appellant.
Steel & Steel, of Nashville, and Boyd Tackett, of Murfreesboro, for appellees.
On August 1, 1940, appellant, a fraternal benefit insurance society, operating under the lodge system, issued its certificate of insurance on the life of Clyde M. Reese, for $2,000, designating his two minor children, Martha Lou Reese and Clyde Edwin Reese, as the beneficiaries thereunder. Insured died on May 29, 1942, in Howard County, Arkansas, where he had resided for many years. Proof of death was made to appellant, but payment was rejected, thereupon this action was instituted. Issuance of the certificate of insurance, the payment of premiums, the death of the insured and the proper presentment of the proof of death are all admitted. Appellant bases its defense upon certain answers made by insured to certain questions contained in the application which appellant contends constituted warranties, and alleges that the same were false. We quote such portion of appellant's answer as will fully disclose its defense:
Dr. E. V. Dildy, called as a witness for appellant, testified that during the past ten or twelve years of insured's life he had occasion from time to time to treat him—"at times for difficult breathing, some times for indigestion, some times for abdominal pains, and some times for complication of the liver". He admitted that he treated insured during his last illness, and filled out and signed the physician's statement in the proof of death, which showed cause of death as acute nephrites, but, in answer to a question therein propounded he also stated that at his office for the past several years, near ten years, he had from time to time treated insured for "Alcoholism and its usual sequences." In his testimony at the trial Dr. Dildy testified that he had treated insured for flu in 1939 or 1940, and was asked if he had treated him for alcoholism prior to that time, and answered:
The deposition of Dr. John Proctor of Hot Springs was taken on interrogations, and offered in evidence by appellant. He testified that the insured came to his office on August 5, 1939, for the purpose of procuring a prescription to take the Hot Springs' baths, that at such time insured was apparently under the influence of liquor and stated to the doctor that he took the same to relieve pain in his legs, insured did not state that he was addicted to the use of alcohol. That he, the doctor, made only such examination as was necessary in order to prescribe the baths, and therefore would not know whether he was suffering from chronic alcoholism, or any other disease acute or chronic.
Appellant...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Woodmen of World Life Insurance Society v. Reese
... ... 1143, 57 ... S.W.2d 1052; Maloney v. Maryland Casualty ... Co., 113 Ark. 174, 167 S.W. 845; Benham v ... American Central Life Ins. Co., 140 Ark. 612, 217 ... S.W. 462; Fowler v. Union Aid Life Ins ... Co., 180 Ark. 140, 20 S.W.2d 611; Sovereign Camp, W ... O. W., v. Hardee, ... ...
-
Froemming v. Gate City Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n
...from such testimony." Powers v. Continental Casualty Co., 301 F.2d 386, 388 (8th Cir.1962) (quoting Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Reese, 206 Ark. 530, 176 S.W.2d 708, 712 (1943)). This is so because "[t]he factfinder is not compelled to believe the testimony of a witness even if it......