Woodson v. Scott
| Decision Date | 31 January 1855 |
| Citation | 20 Mo. 272 |
| Parties | WOODSON, Respondent, v. SCOTT, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. The Supreme Court will not reverse a judgment for excessive damages unless in a very clear case.
Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court.
W. Adams, for appellant.
P. R. Hayden, and J. W. Morrow, for respondent.
1. This is an action of slander. The jury found for the plaintiff, and assessed his damages at five hundred dollars.
The only point presented for our consideration is the amount of damages. The defendant alleges the damages to be excessive.
The record shows the words to have been spoken in an angry quarrel between plaintiff and defendant, when each one was using slanderous and abusive words to and about the other.
In all such cases, the juries of the country are the most appropriate judges of the amount of injury sustained; and to them is properly assigned the authority, and right to assess the consequent amount of damages therefor.
Whenever the courts below, who hear the cases, shall decline to interfere, by directing new trials, this court will feel itself warranted, in most cases, to let their judgments alone. We cannot say that the damages here are excessive, and unless we are satisfied that such is the case, we ought not to reverse. The judgment below is affirmed;
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Minter v. Bradstreet Co.
...and passion, that courts have found themselves compelled to interpose." Dowd v. Air Brake Co., 132 Mo. 379, 34 S. W. 493; Woodson v. Scott, 20 Mo. 272; Chouquette v. Electric Ry. Co., 152 Mo. 257, 53 S. W. 897; Kuenzel v. Stevens, 155 Mo. 280, 56 S. W. 1076; McCloskey v. Pulitzer Pub. Co., ......
-
Merrill v. City of St. Louis
...such as to clearly indicate that the jury acted in disregard of the evidence, or from passion, or prejudice, or corrupt motives. Woodson v. Scott, 20 Mo. 272; Barth v. Merritt, 20 Mo. 567; Wells v. Sanger, 21 Mo. 354; Goetz v. Ambs, 27 Mo. 28; Kennedy v. North Mo. R. R., 36 Mo. 351; Graham ......
-
Liese v. Meyer
... ... excessive. This court will not reverse a judgment for ... excessive damages unless in a very clear case. Woodson v ... Scott, 20 Mo. 272 ... ... OPINION ... [143 ... Mo. 552] Marshall, J ... The ... ...
-
Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad Co.
... ... exceedingly improper bias, on the part of the jury." ... Fallenstein v. Boothe, 13 Mo. 428; Woodson v ... Scott, 20 Mo. 272; Kennedy v. Railroad, 36 Mo ... 351; Klutts v. Railroad, 75 Mo. 642 ... ... [99 ... ...