Woodward v. McLaren

Decision Date19 March 1885
Docket Number11,379
Citation100 Ind. 586
PartiesWoodward et al. v. McLaren
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A. C Capron, for appellants.

J. D McLaren, for appellee.

OPINION

Niblack J.

This was an action to enforce what was claimed to be a lien for material furnished for the repair of a house. Upon the pleadings there was final judgment upon demurrer for the defendant.

The facts, as they are either expressly or impliedly admitted by the pleadings, may be summarized as follows: On the 21st day of July, 1882, one Perkins entered into a written agreement with Susan McLaren, the defendant, for the repair of a dwelling-house belonging to the latter, and situate on the east half of lot No. 46, in the city of Plymouth, in Marshall county, by which it was agreed that Perkins should, within thirty-five days thereafter, do certain specified repairs upon the house for the gross sum of two hundred dollars, to be paid upon the completion of the work, he to furnish all the materials necessary for the repairs thus agreed to be made. On the day following Perkins contracted with Norman S. Woodward and John B. Chambers, partners doing business under the firm name of Norman S. Woodward & Co., for all the brick necessary to be used in repairing the house under his contract with Mrs. McLaren. In pursuance of their contract with Perkins, Norman S. Woodward & Co. soon afterwards delivered to him brick, amounting in value to the sum of $ 49.35, which were used by him in making the repairs upon the house which he had undertaken to make. Upon the completion of the repairs on the house, which was accomplished within the time limited for their completion, Mrs. McLaren paid to Perkins the sum of $ 200, which was understood to be in full of all the work done and materials furnished by him. Perkins having failed to pay Woodward & Co. for the brick which were put into the house, the latter demanded payment of Mrs. McLaren, which was refused. They thereupon, on the 26th day of August, 1882, filed a notice in the recorder's office of Marshall county of their intention to hold a lien on the house and lot on which it stands for the value of the brick, which notice was duly recorded in the proper mechanics' lien record.

Woodward & Chambers, claiming to have thus acquired a lien upon the house and lot, brought this action against Mrs. McLaren to enforce their claim against the property, and the circuit...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Moore-Mansfield Const. Co. v. Indianapolis, N.C.&T. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 27, 1913
    ...by section 867 of the act of 1881, entitled, “An act concerning proceedings in civil cases.” Acts 1881, p. 240. In Woodward v. McLaren, 100 Ind. 586, page 588, this court said: “So much of the Code of 1852 as authorizes the taking and enforcing of liens for work done or materials furnished ......
  • Moore-Mansfield Construction Company v. The Indianapolis, Newcastle And Toledo Railway Company
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 27, 1913
    ... ... § 867 of the act of 1881, entitled "An act ... concerning proceedings in civil cases." Acts 1881 p ...          In ... Woodward v. McLaren (1885), 100 Ind. 586, ... 588, this court said: "So much of the code of 1852 as ... authorized the taking and enforcing of liens for ... ...
  • Badger Lumber Co. v. Stepp
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1900
    ... ... 84 Mo. 602; Mill Co. v. Brundage, 25 Mo.App. 268; ... Page v. Betts, 17 Mo.App. 366; Mollahon v ... Vickery, 4 Mo.App. 225; Woodward v. McLaren, ... 100 Ind. 586; McAdow v. Sturtevant, 41 Mo.App. 226 ...          O. M ... Shanklin, R. T. Linney and O. G. Williams for ... ...
  • National Bank of Jacksonville v. Williams
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • October 20, 1896
    ...106 Mass. 228, and authorities cited; O'Conner v. Hurley, 147 Mass. 145, 16 N.E. 764; Copeland v. Kehoe, 67 Ala. 594; Woodward v. McLaren, 100 Ind. 586; Leismann Lovely, 45 Wis. 420; Peabody v. Society, 5 Allen, 540. The facts in Saunders v. Bennett, 160 Mass. 48, 35 N.E. 111, are very simi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT