Woodworth v. Woodworth

Decision Date18 December 1987
PartiesJudith E. WOODWORTH, Respondent, v. Richard C. WOODWORTH, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Richard C. Woodworth, pro se. Meggesto, Paquette & Badera by Pam Eisenberg, Syracuse, for respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion dismissed, in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this action for a declaratory judgment, it was error for Special Term to grant plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and thereby determine the meaning of a provision in a separation agreement. This motion was premature because no complaint had been served (see, CPLR 3212[a]; Republic Nat. Bank of New York v. Luis Winston, Inc., 107 A.D.2d 581, 483 N.Y.S.2d 311; Miller v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 92 A.D.2d 723, 461 N.Y.S.2d 128). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Donovan, J.--Declaratory Judgment.)

DILLON, P.J., and GREEN, PINE, BALIO and LAWTON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Weinstock v. Handler
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 22 Octubre 1998
    ...is unavailable (Moscato v. City of New York, 183 A.D.2d 599, 601, 584 N.Y.S.2d 39 [unasserted cross claim]; accord, Woodworth v. Woodworth, 135 A.D.2d 1143, 523 N.Y.S.2d 997 [no complaint served] ). Even where a cause of action has been duly asserted in a complaint, this Court has gone so f......
  • Jann v. Cassidy
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Octubre 1999
    ...preceded service of the complaint, at which time a motion for summary judgment would have been premature (see, Woodworth v. Woodworth, 135 A.D.2d 1143, 523 N.Y.S.2d 997). Further, the court could not properly convert defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint into a motion for summary judg......
  • Shaibani v. Soraya
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 Marzo 2010
    ...or counterclaim by the defendant ( see Chakir v. Dime Sav. Bank of N.Y., 234 A.D.2d 577, 578, 651 N.Y.S.2d 622; Woodworth v. Woodworth, 135 A.D.2d 1143, 523 N.Y.S.2d 997). Here, the plaintiff served the defendant with a summonswith notice on or about January 15, 2008. There is no indication......
  • Valentine Transit, Inc. v. Kernizan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Marzo 1993
    ...(see, Freer v. Poncic, 172 A.D.2d 959, 568 N.Y.S.2d 480; Delpopolo v. Zanghi, 140 A.D.2d 930, 529 N.Y.S.2d 611; Woodworth v. Woodworth, 135 A.D.2d 1143, 523 N.Y.S.2d 997; Peterson v. State of New York, 130 A.D.2d 813, 515 N.Y.S.2d 139), it should not have been granted. The case relied upon ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT