Wooldridge v. Scott County Milling Co.
Decision Date | 01 March 1937 |
Docket Number | 5759 |
Parties | Harold Wooldridge, by F. S. Wooldridge, his father and next Friend and Guardian and Curator, Respondent, |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Stoddard County. Honorable J. V Billings, Judge.
Affirmed.
Bailey & Bailey of Sikeston and Oliver & Oliver of Cape Girardeau for Appellant Scott County Milling Company.
Bishop & Claiborne and George E. Heneghan of St. Louis, of Counsel for Scott County Milling Co.
Stephen Barton, of Benton, and Blanton & Montgomery, of Sikeston, for Respondent.
Fulbright, J. Not Sitting.
This is a suit by Harold Wooldridge, a minor, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him when a school bus in which he was a passenger was sideswiped by a ten-ton trailer truck. The accident happened when the truck attempted to pass around the school bus while both were traveling in the same direction going down a long hill on Highway No. 70, near Fredericktown, Missouri.
The suit is against three defendants, as follows:
(1) Allen Wade, who was driving the truck, (2) Fred Sturgeon who owned and operated this trucking service, and (3) the Scott County Milling Company, a corporation, whose products had been transported by the truck from the Scott County Hilling Company's Oran, Missouri plant, to its retail trade in the Missouri Ozarks. Judgment went against all three defendants and all have appealed, but only the milling company is contesting the matter in this court. Hereinafter we shall refer to the Scott County Milling Company as the Appellant.
The suit as originally filed was in one count against the three defendants, and was brought by the minor through F. S Wooldridge, next Friend, appointed by the clerk of the Circuit Court of Scott County.
This first petition was amended and in the amended petition there were two counts. Each count of the amended petition was then amended by interlineation, and this amendment was designated by the parties as "Fly Interlineation".
This "Fly Interlineation" was an allegation of the appointment by the Probate Court of F. S. Wooldridge as guardian and curator and that suit was brought by him as such guardian and curator. This amendment is shown in the second count of the amended petition, and is the second paragraph thereof, which is set off by parentheses. More will be said about this amendment later.
At the close of the case, just before the issues were finally submitted to the jury, the plaintiff elected to stand on the second count of his amended petition. This petition is rather long but we quote it, caption and signature omitted, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rassieur v. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co.
...Life Ins. Co., 168 S.W.2d 956; Marden v. Radford, 84 S.W.2d 947; John Powers v. St. Louis Transit Co., 202 Mo. 267; Wooldridge v. Scott County Milling Co., 102 S.W.2d 958. Hocker, Gladney & Grand, Orville Richardson and J. Chester Jones for respondent. (1) There was no substantial evidence ......
-
Bootee v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
... ... did not affect the validity of Instruction 2. Scott-Force ... Hat Co. v. Hombs, 127 Mo. 393; Wooldridge v. Scott ... y Milling Co., 102 S.W.2d 958; Morris v ... Equitable, 102 S.W.2d 569; Carroll ... ...
-
Niklas v. Metz
... ... Appeal ... from Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Hon. Fred E ... Mueller, Judge ... ... Affirmed ... to McAfee. Wooldridge v. Scott County Milling Co., ... 102 S.W.2d 958; Secs. 5724 (a), 5728, ... ...
-
Porter v. Thompson
... ... Commissioners of the City of St. Louis. Wooldridge v. Scott ... County Milling Co., 102 S.W.2d 958; Kneezle v. Scott ... ...