Workmen's Compensation Bd. v. U.S. Coal & Coke Co.
Decision Date | 15 December 1922 |
Citation | 245 S.W. 900,196 Ky. 833 |
Parties | WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD ET AL. v. UNITED STATES COAL & COKE CO. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Harlan County.
Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Tony Stuck claimant, opposed by the United States Coal & Coke Company. Award to claimant by the Workmen's Compensation Board was modified, and the Board and others appeal. Judgment reversed with directions to enter judgment approving award of the Compensation Board.
Chas I. Dawson, Atty. Gen., Thos. B. McGregor, Asst. Atty. Gen and Clyde R. Levi, of Ashland, for appellants.
Sampson & Sampson, of Harlan, for appellee.
John D. Carroll, of Frankfort, amicus curiæ.
In July, 1920, Tony Stuck, an employee of the United States Coal & Coke Company, while engaged in the discharge of his duties as a coal miner, was injured by falling slate in the mine of that company in Harlan county.
The company had elected to operate under the Workmen's Compensation Act (Ky. St. §§ 4880-4987) and Stuck had agreed to accept the provisions of the act. The company admitted liability for the injury, and voluntarily paid Stuck at the rate of $12 per week for 28 weeks, making a total voluntary payment of $336. Then, however, the company ceased such payments, and Stuck, believing he was entitled to more compensation, filed claim therefor with the Workmen's Compensation Board under the provisions of section 4932, Kentucky Statutes, authorizing the filing of such a claim upon such disagreement by the parties.
The Compensation Board, after the introduction of evidence by each party and a full hearing, awarded to Stuck for total temporary disability $15 per week for a period of 16 weeks, and $1.50 per week for 319 weeks for permanent partial disability, to be credited by the $336 theretofore paid. The board found as a fact that Stuck had sustained a total temporary disability for a period of 16 weeks and a permanent partial disability of 12 1/2 per cent., for which partial disability it allowed him $1.50 per week for 319 weeks, deducting from the maximum of 335 weeks the 16 weeks for which allowance had been made for total temporary disability.
The company, as is authorized by the act, filed a petition in the Harlan circuit court for a review of the award, and that court in its judgment modified the award by allowing Stuck $15 a week for 16 weeks on account of total temporary disability and $1.50 per week for permanent partial disability for the maximum period of 335 weeks, but directed that this latter total amount should be credited by the amount allowed as compensation for total temporary disability during the period of 16 weeks, and directed an additional credit of the $336 theretofore paid on this amount, of which latter credit there is no complaint.
This appeal is from the judgment of the circuit court, and raises the question whether under the terms of our statute, where a temporary period of total disability is followed by a permanent period of partial disability, the amounts paid to or accruing to the claimant during the period of total temporary disability shall be credited upon the amount allowed for permanent partial disability; the allowance for the latter not having reached the maximum. This involves the interpretation of three sections of the Compensation Act, and presents a question which has not heretofore been passed upon in this court or elsewhere, so far as we have been able to ascertain.
Section 4897, in so far as it is applicable, is as follows:
Section 4898 is as follows:
Section 4899, in so far as it is applicable, is as follows:
It will be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re McConnell, 1797
... ... under the Workmen's Compensation Law by Henry McConnell, ... employee, against Murphy ... Sakamoto v. Coal Co., 36 Wyo. 325; Marsh v ... Aljoe, 41 Wyo. 220 ... See also, Workmen's Compensation Bd. v. Coke Co., ... (Ky.) 245 S.W. 900. In the case of Addison v ... before us. This is so because the laws there involved vary ... ...
-
Department of Finance v. Wright
...under discussion in several instances as may be seen by examination of the following decisions: Workmen's Compensation Board v. United States Coal and Coke Company, 196 Ky. 833, 245 S.W. 900; Williams v. Gordon, 313 Ky. 377, 231 S.W.2d 89; Schaab v. Irwin, 298 Ky. 626, 183 S.W.2d 814; Ander......
-
Consolidation Coal Co.'s Receivers v. Patrick
... ... Proceeding ... under the Workmen's Compensation Act by C. H. Patrick, ... opposed by the Consolidation Coal Company's ... Workmen's Compensation Board v. U.S. Coal & Coke ... Co., 196 Ky. 833, 245 S.W. 900, 902 ... "This ... ...
-
Bickel v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Construction Company
... ... under the Indiana Workmen's Compensation Act by William ... J. Bickel, employee, opposed by Ralph ... require us to say that the board erred in its finding that ... the ... Compensation Board v. U. S. Coal & Coke Co ... (1922), 196 Ky. 833, 245 S.W. 900, held ... ...