World Ins. Co. v. Wright, V--245
| Decision Date | 14 February 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. V--245,V--245 |
| Citation | 308 So.2d 612 |
| Parties | WORLD INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Emma C. WRIGHT, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
A. Graham Allen, Freeman, Richardson, Watson, Slade, McCarthy & Kelly, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Gordon H. Lee, Jacksonville, for appellee.
The appellant insurer seeks reversal of a final judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, awarding appellee $863.29 as due under a disability insurance policy and $40,000.00 as compensatory damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress by the appellant disability insurer.
We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examine the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that the cause was properly submitted to the jury for their determination and that the verdict of the jury finds ample support from the testimony and evidence adduced at trial.
It is well-settled that damages for emotional or mental distress may be recovered from one whose conduct was tortious despite the fact that the conduct also involves a breach of contract. Miller v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, 235 So.2d 33 (Fla.App.1st, 1970). Here, the appellant's threatened and actual bad faith (including attempts to 'buy up' the policy) justified an action for damages for the intentional infliction of mental distress, and we think the testimony concerning appellee's ordeal was sufficient to support the verdict of $40,000.00. The matter of the amount of damages is one for the jury. It is not the province of this Court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that error was committed in the proceedings below or that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous. Appellant having failed to show such errors, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Roberts v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.
...of the policy was no longer in force and attempted to obtain the plaintiff's signature surrendering the policy. In World Ins. Co. v. Wright, 308 So.2d 612 (Fla.App., 1975), cert. den. 322 So.2d 913 (Fla., 1975), the court affirmed a jury award for intentional infliction of emotional distres......
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Gibbs, 76--888
...Corp., 224 So.2d 329 (Fla.1969); Henry Morrison Flagler Museum v. Lee, 268 So.2d 434 (Fla.4th DCA 1972); see World Insurance Company v. Wright, 308 So.2d 612 (Fla.1st DCA 1975). An insuror's bad faith refusal to settle a claim of its insured is not per se a willful and independent tort givi......
-
Industrial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Romer
...and Butchikas already alluded to, we are cited to two other Florida cases. The amicus brief refers us to World Insurance Co. v. Wright, 308 So.2d 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), in which the First District allowed an emotional distress claim because the conduct not only involved breach of contract......
-
Rubio v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 94-2821
...allege an independent tort such as fraud or intentional infliction of emotional distress. Opperman, 515 So.2d at 265; World Ins. Co. v. Wright, 308 So.2d 612 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 322 So.2d 913 Section 624.155 permits any person to bring a civil action for damages against the insure......