Wright v. Annucci

Decision Date11 September 2019
Docket NumberIndex No. 3426/15,2015–12038
Parties In the Matter of Earl WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, etc., Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

175 A.D.3d 1306
105 N.Y.S.3d 918 (Mem)

In the Matter of Earl WRIGHT, Petitioner,
v.
Anthony J. ANNUCCI, etc., Respondent.

2015–12038
Index No. 3426/15

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Argued - June 14, 2019
September 11, 2019


Earl Wright, Stormville, NY, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Judith N. Vale and David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & JUDGMENT

175 A.D.3d 1306

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Director of the Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, on behalf of the respondent, Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, dated May 18, 2015. The determination affirmed so much of a determination of a hearing officer dated February 25, 2015, made after a tier III disciplinary hearing, as found that the petitioner was guilty of violating prison disciplinary rule 113.14 ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B][14][iv] ), and imposed penalties.

ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, the determination finding the petitioner guilty of violating prison disciplinary rule 113.14 ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B][14][iv] ) is annulled, the penalties imposed are vacated, the charge is dismissed, and the respondent is directed to expunge all references to that finding from the petitioner's institutional record.

The petitioner, an inmate at the Green Haven Correctional Facility, received medication in the facility's "medication room." He put the medication in his mouth and began to leave the room. As the petitioner left, he was stopped by a corrections officer who directed the petitioner to open his mouth and spit out the remnants of his medication that had not yet dissolved. The petitioner was thereafter charged with, and found guilty of, unauthorized

possession of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Newman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 11, 2019
    ...of counsel), for respondent.WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ROBERT J. MILLER, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.105 N.Y.S.3d 918 DECISION & ORDERORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Farrar , 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305–306,......
  • Rising Tide Fuel, LLC v. Nassau Cnty. Fire Comm'n, 2017–09336
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 11, 2019
    ...of the latter section was not arbitrary and capricious. The petitioner appeals.105 N.Y.S.3d 908 For the reasons set forth in 175 A.D.3d 1306 Matter of Rising Tide Fuel, LLC v. Bambino, ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2019 WL 4281876 ( [decided herewith] ), we affirm the judgment insofar......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT