Wright v. Farmers' Reliance Ins. Co. of New Jersey, 74-1567
Decision Date | 24 June 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 74-1567,74-1567 |
Citation | 314 So.2d 641 |
Parties | Hue WRIGHT, Appellant, v. The FARMERS' RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, a New Jersey Corporation, and Jerome Wright, a minor, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Harold A. Turtletaub, Miami, for appellant.
Cushman & Cushman, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing with prejudice the second cause of action in a two-count complaint. Under the second count, the appellant sought to bring a derivative claim against the Farmers Reliance Insurance Company of New Jersey, insurer, and Jerome Wright, a minor son of the appellant, for injuries sustained by another son, James Elson Wright, by reason of the negligence of his brother, Jerome.
The sole point on appeal is whether a father can maintain a derivative action against his unemancipated minor son and his insurer for loss of services and medical expenses incurred as a result of injuries sustained by another unemancipated son.
We hold that he cannot. See, Orefice v. Albert, Fla.1970, 237 So.2d 142; Meehan v. Meehan, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 776.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mauk v. Mauk, 83-1337
...Silverman (1958), 145 Conn. 663, 666, 145 A.2d 826; Shaker v. Shaker (1942), 129 Conn. 518, 524, 29 A.2d 765; Wright v. Farmers' Reliance Ins. Co. (Fla.App.1975), 314 So.2d 641; Meehan v. Meehan (Fla.App.1961), 133 So.2d 776, 777; Harlan Natl. Bank v. Gross (Ky.1961), 346 S.W.2d 482; Thomps......
- El Conquistador Condominium, Inc. v. Miller, 75-176