Wright v. State, 77-1128
| Citation | 355 So.2d 870 |
| Decision Date | 08 March 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 77-1128,77-1128 |
| Parties | James Bernard WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, Victoria J. Powell, Asst. Public Defender, and Lawrence D. Shearer, Legal Intern, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Appellant filed a motion to correct his sentence pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, contending he had not been given credit for all the time he had spent in jail prior to imposition of his sentence. The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse.
Appellant was originally charged with grand larceny on October 18, 1974. On March 18, 1975, he pled guilty pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial judge stating that appellant would be placed on probation for three years with the special condition that he serve the first year in jail "with credit for time served." The order placing appellant on probation, however, recited no such special condition but contained a note at the top which read: "Presently serving one year County Jail." Nowhere in this order was there any mention of credit for time served.
On April 21, 1975, an affidavit and warrant were filed charging appellant with having violated his probation by escaping from jail on March 25, 1975. At that point, appellant was still at large, but he was eventually apprehended. At a hearing held on August 27, 1975, the probation violation charge was dropped in exchange for his plea of guilty to the substantive charge of escape that had also been brought against him. At that hearing appellant informed the court that he had been free for about three months as a result of his escape.
In September and October of 1975, appellant was charged with further probation violations. After a hearing held on November 4, 1975, the trial court revoked appellant's probation and sentenced him to five years in prison with credit for 117 days served in jail. The 117 days credit was apparently awarded pursuant to a memorandum from the sheriff's office indicating that appellant had served that many days in jail.
On appellant's direct appeal, this court affirmed; Wright v. State, 338 So.2d 850 (Fla.2d DCA 1976). Appellant subsequently filed the instant motion alleging, inter alia, that the trial court had failed to give him credit for the time he spent in jail from his arrest...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Vanderblomen v. State
...2d DCA 1982); Wargo v. State, 393 So.2d 3 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Cooper v. State, 379 So.2d 199 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Wright v. State, 355 So.2d 870 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Giles v. State, 350 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). In fact, at one point this court had to clarify that while such jail or pri......
-
Velez v. State, 86-1771
...for all time spent in jail prior to sentence on his offense. Ault v. State, 415 So.2d 147 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). See also Wright v. State, 355 So.2d 870 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Reversed and remanded for DANAHY, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur. ...
-
Ault v. State, 81-1732
...on June 20, 1980. Appellant is entitled to credit for all the time he spent in jail prior to sentencing on his offense. Wright v. State, 355 So.2d 870 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Additionally, appellant contends that the court should have given him credit for the period of time he was in custody in......
-
Allen v. State, 77-2344
...Appellant is entitled to no relief. See Saunders v. State, supra, and Hicks v. State, 165 So.2d 204 (2 DCA 1964); and Wright v. State, 355 So.2d 870 (Fla. 2 DCA 1978). REVERSED and REMANDED for an evidentiary hearing on Appellant's Rule 3.850 ALDERMAN, C. J., and MOORE, J., concur. ...