Wright v. State, 91-1212
| Decision Date | 20 November 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 91-1212,91-1212 |
| Parties | 17 Fla. L. Week. D2605 Arthur WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A. Lucas, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Under the facts presented, we find no merit in appellant's contention that his convictions for robbery with a firearm, aggravated assault and battery constitute double jeopardy. We do agree, however, that the lower court erred in making consecutive the "minimum mandatory" sentences imposed after determining that the defendant was a habitual violent felony offender. Such minimum mandatory sentences must be imposed to run concurrently when they arise from a single criminal episode, as in this case. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992); Penton v. State, 605 So.2d 1319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Accordingly we affirm the judgments but vacate the sentences imposed and remand with instructions to resentence appellant to concurrent minimum mandatory sentences.
JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED; SENTENCES VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (95-1), 85338
... ... See State v. Werner, 609 So.2d 585 (Fla.1992) ... 4. The committee recommends an amendment ... probation officer, correctional ... officer. See Wright v. State, 608 So.2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA ... 1992) ... Note to In giving ... ...
- Viloria v. State, 92-778