Wright v. State, WD 75260.
| Decision Date | 24 September 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. WD 75260.,WD 75260. |
| Parties | Brian S. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bates County, James K. Journey, Judge.
Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.
Brian Wright appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of sexual abuse and false imprisonment. Wright contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because defense counsel was ineffective for failing to present evidence that would have aided his credibility and provided him with a viable defense. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court's judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wright v. Crews
...denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 29.15 was upheld on appeal thereof. Wright v. State, 409 S.W. 3d 580 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). Petitioner has completed his sentence for false imprisonment and currently is serving his sentence for sexual abuse. Pe......
- State v. Anderson, WD 75393.