Wright v. Wooldridge
Decision Date | 21 March 1910 |
Citation | 126 S.W. 841,94 Ark. 276 |
Parties | WRIGHT v. WOOLDRIDGE |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Cleveland Chancery Court; John M. Elliott, Chancellor; reversed.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
A. T. Whitelaw, for appellant.
The chancery court was without jurisdiction. Kirby's Dig., § 5985; 71 Ark. 222; Id. 484; 46 Ark. 272. Jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent of parties where none existed before 33 Ark. 31; 34 Ark. 399; 70 Ark. 347; 1 Black on Judgments, 217.
Pitt Holmes, for appellee.
Since the chancery court would not assume jurisdiction of this cause except upon agreement of parties waiving objections as to jurisdiction, appellant ought not to be heard now to object to the jurisdiction.
This action was brought by J. H. Wright against E. and H. Wooldridge, on the 14th day of December, 1906, before a justice of the peace of Cleveland County, to recover $ 200, loaned by plaintiff to the defendants, and interest. The plaintiff recovered judgment, and the defendants appealed to the Cleveland Circuit Court. On appeal the action was transferred by consent to the Cleveland Chancery Court, and on hearing that court dismissed plaintiff's complaint for want of equity, and plaintiff appealed to this court.
In Whitesides v. Kershaw, 44 Ark. 377, 379, it is said: To the same effect, see Brewer v. Winston, 46 Ark. 163; Jackson v. Gorman, 70 Ark. 88, 66 S.W. 346; Barrett v. Nichols, 85 Ark. 58, 107 S.W. 171.
Neither could a chancery court, in such cases, acquire, by a transfer from the circuit court, jurisdiction which the justice of the peace did not have. Justices of the peace cannot enforce equitable remedies, and no such jurisdiction can be acquired by any court by appeal from that court.
The judgment of the chancery court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to that court to remand it to the Cleveland Circuit Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rockefeller v. Hogue
...Cox, 200 Ark. 247, 138 S.W.2d 778; Markham v. Evans, 239 Ark. 1154, 397 S.W.2d 365; Whitesides v. Kershaw, 44 Ark. 377; Wright v. Wooldridge, 94 Ark. 276, 126 S.W. 841. Where the court from which an appeal is taken has no jurisdiction, the appeal confers none. Gregory v. Williams, 24 Ark. 1......
- Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. Nix
-
Raymond v. Raymond
...Williams & Seawel, for appellant. 1. The court erred in its action with reference to the plea of res adjudicata and former suit pending. 94 Ark. 276; Id. 558; 110 Id. 117-121. A judgment, however erroneous, is binding unless reversed on appeal. 66 Ark. 629; 8 Id. 318; 31 Id. 187; 35 Id. 211......
- Johnson v. Cheek