Wroblewski v. Ricotta

Decision Date23 October 1974
Citation320 N.E.2d 647,361 N.Y.S.2d 913,35 N.Y.2d 745
Parties, 320 N.E.2d 647 In the Matter of Felix T. WROBLEWSKI et al., Appellants, v. Joseph J. RICOTTA, as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

John J. Olszewski, Buffalo, for appellants.

Peter J. Notary, Asst. Dist. Atty., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed (see Matter of Paciona v. Marshall, 35 N.Y.2d 289, 360 N.Y.S.2d 882, 319 N.E.2d 199). We would also note that the petitioner made a timely motion to dismiss the indictment alleging illegality of the jury selection process. Appellate review of a denial of that motion, if available at all, would only be on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction if one ensued. (CPL 470.15, subd. 1; CPLR 7801, subd. 1; cf. People v. Chestnut, 26 N.Y.2d 481, 311 N.Y.S.2d 853, 260 N.E.2d 501.)

BREITEL, C.J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, SAMUEL RABIN and STEVENS, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion.

Judgment, 45 A.D.2d 461, 359 N.Y.S.2d 130 affirmed, without costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Barrett v. Rosenthal
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 21, 2004
  • Dondi v. Jones
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 3, 1976
    ... ... Marshall, 35 N.Y.2d 289, 360 N.Y.S.2d 882, 319 N.E.2d 199; Matter of Wroblewski v. Ricotta, 35 N.Y.2d 745, 361 N.Y.S.2d 913, 320 N.E.2d 647). Time and time again, this court has made unequivocally clear that, as a matter of law, ... ...
  • Barrett v. Rosenthal
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • October 15, 2003
  • Hogan v. Herald Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 29, 1982
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • E-law 4: Computer Information Systems Law and System Operator Liability
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 21-03, March 1998
    • Invalid date
    ...v. Western Union Tel. Co., 113 F.2d 539, 542 (1st Cir. 1940); Von Meysenburg, 54 F. Supp at 101. 68. Anderson v. New York Tel. Co., 320 N.E.2d 647 (N.Y. 1974). 69. People v. Lauria, 59 Cal. Rptr. 628 (1967). 70. Charles, supra note 25, at 143. 71. Id. at 123. 72. Electronic Communications P......
  • The Unidentified Wrongdoer
    • United States
    • University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Law Review (FC Access) No. 56-3, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...125 P.3d 389, 392 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005) (explaining that conduits are not liable for defamation by customers); Anderson v. N.Y. Tel. Co., 320 N.E.2d 647, 648-49 (N.Y. 1974) (holding that the defendant phone company that leased recording equipment to a third party who created and distributed......
  • Public law at the New York Court of Appeals: an update on developments, 2000.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 64 No. 4, June 2001
    • June 22, 2001
    ...boy scout troop leader). (71) See id. at 540. (72) Id. at 543. (73) See id. at 541-42 (relying on Anderson v. New York Telephone Co., 320 N.E.2d 647 (N.Y. 1974), for the proposition that telephone companies are not publishers and Internet service providers should be treated as telephone (74......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT