Wynn v. Com.
Decision Date | 17 April 1923 |
Citation | 249 S.W. 783,198 Ky. 644 |
Parties | WYNN v. COMMONWEALTH. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Harlan County.
Wright Wynn was convicted of having intoxicating liquors in his possession for the purpose of sale, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded for new trial.
J. S Forester, of Harlan, for appellant.
Chas I. Dawson, Atty. Gen., and T. B. McGregor, Asst. Atty. Gen for the Commonwealth.
On the evidence of two witnesses who stated that they went to appellant's home and saw there several fruit jars containing whisky, appellant was convicted of having intoxicating liquors in his possession for the purpose of sale.
Complaint is made of the following instruction:
"The possession by a person of intoxicating liquors, when it is proven that he was in possession of it, is prima facie evidence of guilt for having it in possession for the purpose of sale, and the burden is upon the person having it in possession to prove that he did not have it for sale."
The case is controlled by the Prohibition Act of 1920 (chapter 81, Acts 1920), which was in force when the offense was alleged to have been committed. Section 8 of that act is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Surma
...v. Gallo, 275 Mass. 320, 175 N.E. 718, 725, 79 A.L.R. 1380; United States v. Goodhues, D.C.Md., 53 F.2d 696, 701; and Wynn v. Commonwealth, 198 Ky. 644, 249 S.W. 783, 784. Probably an equal number of decisions could be cited contra to the effect that the use of the word 'action' includes cr......
- Lissenbee v. Com.