Wynn v. Department of Human Resources

Decision Date04 April 1979
Docket NumberNo. 57061,57061
PartiesWYNN v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Sarah M. Tipton, Vidalia, for appellant.

Jones, Jones & Hilburn, Eric L. Jones, William L. Tribble, Dublin, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Carol Atha Cosgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

SHULMAN, Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the Juvenile Court of Treutlen County terminating the appellant's parental rights in two of her children.

1. The essence of appellant's first enumeration of error is that the evidence does not support the termination. A parent's rights with respect to his child may be terminated if "the child is a deprived child and the court finds that the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue or will not be remedied and that by reason thereof the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental moral, or emotional harm." Code Ann. § 24A-3201(a)(2).

In March, 1977, the appellant's two children were found to be "deprived" within the meaning of Code Ann. § 24A-401(h), one child having "suffered considerable physical abuse to his body including bone fragmentation (and) irregularity and had all the characteristics and symptoms of a battered child." Pursuant to this finding, the children were removed from the appellant and placed in the temporary custody of the Treutlen County Department of Family & Children Services.

Subsequently, a petition was filed seeking a termination of appellant's parental rights. After a hearing, this petition was granted, and it is from the order terminating those rights that this appeal is taken.

At the termination hearing, there was evidence that the appellant was the mother of another child who had also been found to be deprived and abused; appellant's rights in that child had been terminated. Appellant's caseworker testified that in her experience and training, "It is dangerous to return a child after this thing has occurred more than once."

There was further evidence that in the interim between the first hearing, which found the children to be "deprived," and the hearing on termination, the appellant had been psychologically evaluated as an "emotionally immature personality" about whom "there is considerable doubt at the present time as to whether (she) is up to handling the stresses associated with coping with the incessant, dependent demands of two pre-school age children . . ."

There was testimony that she had sought but then discontinued emotional counseling. She made sporadic telephone inquiries concerning her children but had seen them only once since they were removed from her custody.

Appellant's caseworker testified that she had not seen "any decided change in the family situation since the time of the last hearing" and that, in her opinion, if the children were returned to the appellant they "would suffer the same type of treatment they suffered in the past."

There is no doubt that the termination of parental rights is a severe measure. See In the Interest of: A. A. G., 146 Ga.App. 534(2), 246 S.E.2d 739 and cits. However, " '(a) termination hearing seeks above all else the welfare of the child . . .' " In re Levi, 131 Ga.App. 348, 352, 206 S.E.2d 82, 85. "Affirmative evidence of moral unfitness, physical abuse, abandonment, refusal to support, or similar misconduct by a parent or The likelihood of substantial threat to a child's physical, mental, moral, or emotional wellbeing, justifiably warrants the termination of a parent's right to his child." Elrod v. Hall County...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Chancey v. Department of Human Resources
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 6, 1980
    ...Clayton County DFCS, 147 Ga.App. 825, 250 S.E.2d 564 (1978); Roberson v. DHR, 148 Ga.App. 626, 252 S.E.2d 57 (1979); Wynn v. DHR, 149 Ga.App. 559, 254 S.E.2d 883 (1979); Avera v. Rainwater, 150 Ga.App. 39, 256 S.E.2d 648 (1979); Kilgore v. DHR, 151 Ga.App. 19, 258 S.E.2d 680 (1979); Cox v. ......
  • H.L.T., In Interest of
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 23, 1982
    ...Ga.App. 758, 760, 285 S.E.2d 220 (1981); Painter v. Barkley, 157 Ga.App. 69, 70, 276 S.E.2d 850 (1981); Wynn v. Dept. of Human Resources, 149 Ga.App. 559, 561, 254 S.E.2d 883 (1979); Childers v. Clayton County Dept. of Family etc. Serv., 147 Ga.App. 825, 826, 250 S.E.2d 564 (1978); In the I......
  • Vermilyea v. Department of Human Resources
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 18, 1980
    ...cause to terminate parental rights. Hood v. Dept. of Human Resources, 150 Ga.App. 219, 257 S.E.2d 340; Wynn v. Dept. of Human Resources, 149 Ga.App. 559, 254 S.E.2d 883. See also In the Interest of M. A. C., 244 Ga. 645, 261 S.E.2d 590; In the Interest of J. C., 242 Ga. 737, 251 S.E.2d 299.......
  • Painter v. Barkley, 60487
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 9, 1981
    ...S.E.2d 739 (1978); Childers v. Dept. of Family &c. Serv., 147 Ga.App. 825, 826, 250 S.E.2d 564 (1978); Wynn v. Dept. of Human Resources, 149 Ga.App. 559, 561, 254 S.E.2d 883 (1979). The juvenile court here recognized this factor and declined to terminate appellee's parental rights. In the a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT