Yandell v. Delgado

Decision Date06 October 1971
Docket NumberNo. B--2845,B--2845
Citation471 S.W.2d 569
PartiesMichael C. YANDELL, Petitioner, v. Vincent H. DELGADO, as next friend of Elizabeth Delgado, a Minor, Respondent.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Brown, Crowley, Simon & Peebles, M. Hendricks Brown, Fort Worth, for petitioner.

Puff & Jameson, Jim Jameson, Fort Worth, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

We approve the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals stated as follows: 'We hold that subject, of course, to the proof required in such cases a cause of action does exist for prenatal injuries sustained at any prenatal stage provided the child is born alive and survives.' 468 S.W.2d 475, 478.

The application is refused, no reversible error.

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Witty v. American General Capital Distributors, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • February 25, 1987
    ...Death Claim In 1971, we held that live birth was required for a child to have a cause of action for prenatal injuries. Yandell v. Delgado, 471 S.W.2d 569 (Tex.1971). Similarly, where there has been no live birth, the clear, unambigious language of the Wrongful Death Act precludes recovery f......
  • Edinburg Hosp. Authority v. Trevino
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • April 18, 1997
    ...medical treatment of a fetus not born alive. Id. at 506; see Pietila v. Crites, 851 S.W.2d 185, 186 (Tex.1993); Yandell v. Delgado, 471 S.W.2d 569, 570 (Tex.1971). Without these causes of action, parents "are precluded from recovering damages for their loss of society, companionship, and af......
  • Carranza v. Carranza-Sanchez
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • December 20, 2011
    ...Sylvia v. Gobeille, 101 R.I. 76, 220 A.2d 222, 224 (1966); Hall v. Murphy, 236 S.C. 257, 113 S.E.2d 790, 793 (1960); Yandell v. Delgado, 471 S.W.2d 569, 570 (1971); Seattle–First Nat'l Bank v. Rankin, 59 Wash.2d 288, 367 P.2d 835, 838 (1962); see also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 869(1) ......
  • Ankrom v. State (Ex parte Ankrom)
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 11, 2013
    ...(by implication in wrongful-death action); Delgado v. Yandell, 468 S.W.2d 475 (Tex.App.1971), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 471 S.W.2d 569 (Tex.1971) (prenatal injury); Kalafut v. Gruver, 239 Va. 278, 283, 389 S.E.2d 681, 683–84 (1990) (adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 869(1) in con......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT