Yates v. State, V--194
Decision Date | 30 June 1975 |
Docket Number | No. V--194,V--194 |
Citation | 317 So.2d 462 |
Parties | Roy Junior YATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Appellant was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
It is urged that the trial court erred in failing to provide counsel for the appellant and the deprivation resulted in a confession being unlawfully admitted into evidence against the appellant.
Appellant states that he requested counsel at his first appearance hearing some seventy two (72) hours after arrest, but one was not appointed until approximately sixty eight (68) days after his arrest.
Examination of the record clearly reflects that the appellant was taken before a magistrate prior to giving a statement. The motion to suppress filed in the lower court was not predicated on the absence of proper warning, or the delay and denial of counsel, but that the statement was in exchange for a promise that appellant would be placed in a cell with his younger brother whom he was worried about. This was refuted by the officers whom apparently the trial judge chose to believe, thereby finding the statements being made freely and voluntarily. In the case of Baker v. State, 225 So.2d 327 (Fla.1969), the Supreme Court rejected a claim similar to the case at bar citing to this Court's opinion in Lee v. State, 173 So.2d 520 (Fla.App.1st, 1965), saying:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
De La Cova v. State, 76-1848
...is in possession of a firearm when committing a burglary or when a victim is shot after an attempted robbery. See Yates v. State, 317 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); and Meeks v. State, 289 So.2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). It is clear, therefore, that these defendants violated two separate stat......
-
White v. State, CC-205
...W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Copeland v. State, 336 So.2d 653 (Fla. 2 DCA 1976); Yates v. State, 317 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1 DCA 1975). Gillman v. State, 346 So.2d 586 (Fla. 1 DCA RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur. ...
-
Williams v. State, C--282
...offenses of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. (Yates v. State, Fla.App.1st 1975, 317 So.2d 462). Sub judice, the offenses for which appellant was convicted involved separate and distinct elements. The crime of possess......