Yerkes v. Rockwood Clinic, 930--III

Citation11 Wn.App. 936,527 P.2d 689
Decision Date28 October 1974
Docket NumberNo. 930--III,930--III
PartiesClaude T. YERKES, Appellant, v. ROCKWOOD CLINIC et al., Respondents.
CourtWashington Court of Appeals

William C. Harrison, Spokane, for appellant.

Richard E. Hayes of MacGillivray, Jones, Clarke, Schiffner & Johnson, Spokane, for respondents.

GREEN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Claude T. Yerkes, brought this action against the defendants, Rockwood Clinic, E. V. Johnston, M.D., and Tex T. Hoffmeister, M.D., alleging that these defendants negligently failed to inform him of the material facts necessary to the giving of his informed consent to 'certain procedures and treatment.' Defendants moved for summary judgment, claiming plaintiff's action is barred by the statute of limitation. 1 The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the action. 2 Plaintiff appeals.

On September 7, 1965, plaintiff underwent surgery for a narrowing of his esophagus. In his answers to written interrogatories, plaintiff states that defendants, during surgery, severed the vagus nerve without his permission. Defendants' alleged negligence is said to consist of:

Cutting of the Vegus nerve. Operation on the plaintiff's esophagus leaving stitched (wire) in place, without curing esophagus.

Cut vegus nerve without asking for permission, terminating flow of hydrachloricacid, and without advice as to future results; said negligence resulted in constant diahrrea (sic) for plaintiff and loss of equilibruim (sic).

causing injuries as follows:

Constant diahrrea (sic), loss of equilibrium, severe chest congestion at slightest exposure, extremely susceptible to colds, affected my nerves, ruined my sex life and gave me what I term weeping anus.

For 10 days after surgery, defendants gave plaintiff:

Stool examinations and medication for diahrrea (sic) and color shots in veins to determine arterial insufficiency. Medication for Mineares (sic) Disease.

Plaintiff's contact with defendants occurred when Dr. Eaner Higgins, while casually talking to plaintiff in a Kalispell Montana hospital pharmacy in 1965, was requested to make an appointment for plaintiff at the defendant Rockwood Clinic, for a low back problem. Although plaintiff was not a patient of Dr. Higgins, defendant, Dr. Johnston, wrote Dr. Higgins on September 30, 1965, as follows:

Mr. Yerkes underwent his surgery at Sacred Heart Hospital here in Spokane on September 7, 1965. We found a rather typical achalasia with a narrowing of the lowest esophageal segment. We did a localized myotomy, a so-called Meller procedure, plus a vagotomy, pyloroplasty and reconstruction of the hiatus itself.

He did extremely well postoperatively and had no complications. I have heard from him twice by telephone and he continues to eat well.

I have discussed the problem of his dizziness for which you have been treating him, with Dr. Hoffmeister here, and we both felt that this was most likely not related to the medicines he received or the anesthetic materials. I suggested that he go on a salt-free diet and try Hydrodiuril just to see if the dehydrating procedures would help what is probably a slight hydrops of the semicircular canals, and am hopeful that this will be helpful.

The record does not disclose whether plaintiff was informed of the contents of this letter.

Subsequently, plaintiff consulted Drs. Bruce Allison and Donald Forbeck in Montana. Dr. Forbeck, responding to interrogatories, states that he first saw plaintiff on November 15, 1965. At that time, plaintiff complained of the following symptoms:

(U)nsteadiness, which had been an intermittent affliction since September, 1965. . . . that about five weeks prior to his neurologic examination he developed an ear infection on the left, this being manifested by fullness in the left ear as well as apparent swelling along the left lateral aspect of his neck. Following myringotomy, this ear infection cleared uneventfully, but his improvement in this respect was associated with no apparent benefit on his unsteadiness. The latter disturbance entailed a tendency for veering to the right as well as perhaps a momentary visual darkening. He also mentioned 'jumping' of objects in his field of vision when his unsteadiness was present and stated his surgical history to be:

(T)hat in the past he had a tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, a lumbar spine fusion in about 1940, a transurethral resection of his prostate gland, a cholecystectomy, and surgery for an apparent esophageal stricture in September 1965.

Dr. Forbeck further said:

I have no record of his telling that his vagus nerve had been severed.

He last examined plaintiff on December 1, 1966 and could not recall any complaints of chronic diarrhea.

Dr. Allison, answering interrogatories, said he first saw plaintiff on July 5, 1966, and described his complaints as:

Intermittent dizziness and poor balance since spinal fusion in 1940. Frequent episodes of low back pain, gas, and loose bowel movements. Weakness and fatigue.

Prior surgical procedures were noted as:

1940 Spinal fusion

1955 and 1960 Transurethral prostatic resection

1962 Cholecystectomy

1965 Repair of hiatal hernia.

Pertaining to the severance of the vagus nerve, Dr. Allison stated: 'He told me about this but I did not record the date. I believe it was sometime in 1969.' Plaintiff is presently and has been under Dr. Allison's care:

Since 1967 I have seen him intermittently for multiple complaints, mainly a mild chronic prostatis (sic), for which I give him prostatic massage every few months. He has consulted me with complaints of intermittent diarrhea, low back pain, and right sciatic neuritis.

Mr. Yerkes has chronic problems, but feel that his chronic diarrhea is due to an irritable colon syndrome. He has had stool cultures, sigmoidoscopy, and colon x-rays with no abnormal findings except for a minimal diverticulosis of the sigmoid colon.

and as to his chronic diarrhea:

He first consulted me with a complaint of chronic, intermittent diarrhea of several years duration on January 16, 1967. However, it had been more severe for the past ten days. I do not have the exact date when it commenced, but he recently told me that it started after his gall bladder or hiatal hernia surgery. Last year he seriously inquired if I could arrange for him to have a gall bladder transplant done to help correct his condition.

Dr. Allison states that he never told plaintiff the diarrhea was the probable result of a vagotomy performed in September 1965.

By affidavit, plaintiff states:

(O)n or about March 20, 1970 I first learned the consequences of having one's vague nerve severed; I learned of the possible consequences during a discussion with a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Ohler v. Tacoma General Hospital
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 16 Agosto 1979
    ...differ about when Lana discovered that her blindness may have been caused by Tacoma General's wrongful acts. Yerkes v. Rockwood Clinic, 11 Wash.App. 936, 941-42, 527 P.2d 689 (1974). A genuine issue of material facts exists and its resolution should be left to the trier of Respondent Tacoma......
  • Foil v. Ballinger
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • 19 Septiembre 1979
    ...v. Morgan, 397 Pa. 282, 154 A.2d 788 (1959); Johnson v. Caldwell, 371 Mich. 368, 123 N.W.2d 785 (1963); and Yerkes v. Rockwood Clinic, 11 Wash.App. 936, 527 P.2d 689 (1974). This rule has also been applied by a federal court in a Federal Tort Claims Act case, Jordan v. United States, 503 F.......
  • Kittinger v. Boeing Co.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 9 Octubre 1978
    ...Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 17 Wash.App. 626, 564 P.2d 817 (1977) (stockbroker's negligence); Yerkes v. Rockwood Clinic, 11 Wash.App. 936, 527 P.2d 689 (1974) (negligent failure to inform a patient of risks in treatment); Kundahl v. Barnett, 5 Wash.App. 227, 486 P.2d 1164 (......
  • Duffy v. King Chiropractic Clinic
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 6 Junio 1977
    ...v. Simpson Tbr. Co., 69 Wash.2d 949, 421 P.2d 674 (1966). Duffy relies primarily upon our recent decision in Yerkes v. Rockwood Clinic, 11 Wash.App. 936, 527 P.2d 689 (1974), to support his contention. While Yerkes is similar, it is distinguishable. During esophagus surgery, Yerkes' vagus n......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT