York v. Mathis
Decision Date | 16 September 1907 |
Citation | 103 Me. 67,68 A. 746 |
Parties | YORK et al. v. MATHIS et al. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Judicial Court, Penobscot County, in Equity.
Bill in equity by Samuel N. York and others against L. D. Mathis and the Eastern Musical Association and another. Decree for plaintiffs, and the Eastern Musical Association appeals. Appeal dismissed, and decree below affirmed.
Bill in equity brought by the plaintiffs, "Samuel N. York, of Brewer, in the county of Penobscot, state of Maine, and Charles P. Poster, of Bangor, in said county, copartners in business under the name of Poster & York," against "L. D. Mathis, of Portland, in the county of Cumberland, in said state, and the Eastern Musical Association, a corporation duly created by law, and having its place of business at said Bangor, and the Eastern Trust Banking Company, a corporation duly created by law, and having its place of business at said Bangor," to enforce the plaintiffs' lien claim upon the Auditorium Building, so called, in said Bangor, and the leasehold interest in the land upon which it stands, owned by the said Eastern Maine Musical Association, for materials furnished and labor performed by the plaintiffs in relaying a part of the floor in said Auditorium Building during the occupancy of the defendant Mathis who held under a written lease from the said musical association for the term of 10 months beginning May 20, 1905, for a rental of $1,500. This lease expressly provided that the premises were "to be used as a skating rink."
The Eastern Maine Musical Association, one of the defendants, duly filed its answer to the bill. The other defendants Mathis and the Eastern Trust & Banking Company did not answer, and the bill was taken pro confesso as to Mathis and by consent was dismissed as to the Eastern Trust & Banking Company.
The cause came on for hearing at the January term, 1907, of the Supreme Judicial Court, Penobscot county. By the request of the plaintiffs, set forth in the bill, a Jury trial was had as provided by Rev. St. c. 93, § 36. Before proceeding with the trial, the following admissions were made:
Counsel for the Eastern Maine Musical Association stated as follows:
The jury returned a verdict that the plaintiffs had a lien upon the building and leasehold interest in land of the Eastern Maine Musical Association described in the bill, "as alleged by them."
The presiding justice then made and filed the following decree:
This decree was drawn under the provisions of Rev. St. c. 03, § 37. From this decree the Eastern Maine Musical Association duly appealed to the law court, as provided by Rev. St. c. 79, § 22.
All the material facts appear in the opinion.
Argued before EMERY, C. J., and WHITE-HOUSE, PEABODY, SPEAR, and CORNISH, JJ.
F. A. Floyd and Matthew Laughlin, for plaintiffs. Fred V. Matthews, for defendant L. D. Mathis. E. C. Ryder, for defendant Eastern Maine Musical Ass'n. C. A. Bailey, for defendant Eastern Trust & Banking Co.
This is a bill in equity to enforce the plaintiffs' lien claim upon the Auditorium Building in Bangor and the leasehold interest in the land upon which it stands, owned by the Eastern Maine Musical Association, for materials furnished and labor performed by the plaintiffs in relaying a part of the floor during the occupancy of the defendant Mathis, who held under a written lease from the musical association for the term of 10 months, beginning May 20, 1905, for a rental of $1,500. This lease expressly provided that the premises were "to be used as a skating rink."
The following provisions are found in chapter 93 of the Revised Statutes, relating to mechanics' liens. Section 29: "Whoever performs labor or furnishes labor or materials in erecting, altering, moving or repairing a house, building or appurtenances, or in constructing, altering, or repairing a wharf, or pier, or any building thereon, by virtue of a contract with or by consent of the owner, has a lien thereon, and, on the land on which it stands and on any interest such owner has in the same, to secure payment thereof, with costs." Section 30: "If the labor or materials were not furnished by a contract with the owner of the property affected, the owner may prevent such lien for labor or materials not then performed or furnished by giving written notice to the person performing or furnishing the same, that he will not be responsible therefor." Section 31, Pub. Laws 1905, p. 116, c. 110: "The lien mentioned in the preceding section shall be dissolved unless the claimant within sixty days after he ceases to labor or furnish materials as aforesaid, files in the office of the clerk of the town in which such building, wharf or pier is situated, a true statement of the amount...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
NEW ENG. EXPLOSIVES v. Maine Ledge Blasting Spec.
...somewhat similar circumstances, compare Corey Co. v. Cummings Construction Co., 118 Me. 34, 105 A. 405 (1919), with York v. Mathis, 103 Me. 67, 68 A. 746 (1907), an undertaking more appropriately left to the courts of the state. See Manas y Pineiro v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 443 F.Supp. 418, ......
-
Allis-Chalmers Co. v. Central Trust Co. of New York
...While the expression would doubtless cover implied or quasi contracts between mechanic and owner, yet from the opinion in York v. Mathis, 103 Me. 67, 76, 68 A. 746, Huntley v. Holt, 58 Conn. 445, 20 A. 469, 9 L.R.A. 111, it would appear that 'by consent of the owner' means something differe......
-
Twin Island Development Corp. v. Winchester
...Shepley) 256, 266 (1845); Perkins v. Hitchcock, 49 Me. 468, 477 (1860); Union Bank v. Stone, 50 Me. 595, 599 (1862); York v. Mathis, 103 Me. 67, 81, 68 A. 746, 752 (1907); Devine v. Tierney and Findlen, 139 Me. 50, 55-56; 27 A.2d 134, 136 (1942); Berry v. Adams, 145 Me. 291, 295, 75 A.2d 46......
-
Farnsworth v. Whiting
...v. Witham, 75 Me. 536; Proctor v. Rand, 94 Me. 313. 318, 47 Atl. 537; Herlihy v. Coney, 99 Me. 469, 471, 59 Atl. 952; York v. Mathis, 103 Me. 67, 74, 75, 68 Atl. 746. In the second case, in which it is sought to recover the contents of the box in the safe deposit vault of the Security Trust......