Young v. Bureau Of Unemployment Comp.
Decision Date | 05 July 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 28257.,28257. |
Citation | 10 S.E.2d. 412 |
Parties | YOUNG. v. BUREAU OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, etc. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied July 30, 1940.
Syllabus by the Court.
The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the defendant's plea, and in finding in favor of the plaintiff.
Error from Civil Court, Fulton County; Robert Carpenter, Jr., Judge.
Action by the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, etc., against Johnson S. Young, to collect sums of money alleged to be due plaintiff by defendant under the Georgia Unemployment Compensation Act, Laws 1937, p. 806, Laws 1937-1938, Ex.Sess., p. 356. To review a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
Affirmed.
The Bureau of Unemployment Compensation of the State of Georgia, by and through Ben T. Huiet, Commissioner of Labor, as administrator of the Georgia Unemployment Compensation Law, brought suit in the Civil Court of Fulton County against Johnson S. Young, to collect certain sums alleged to be due the plaintiff by the defendant on the basis of reports made and submitted to the plaintiff by the defendant, as an employer under the Georgia Unemployment Compensation Act. It was alleged in substance in the petition that while the defendant admitted his liability under the above act, he has failed and refused, after repeated demands, to pay the amount due by him thereunder. The plaintiff prayed for judgment in the amount claimed to be due by the defendant, with interest thereon at the rate of one per cent per month, as provided in the act. Attached to the petition as an exhibit appears a statement of the account of Johnson S. Young, purporting to show payments made by him under the act, and the amount of the balance claimed to be yet due, and sued for in the foregoing suit.
The defendant in his answer admitted among other things that he had made a report, but denied that he had admitted any indebtedness. Further answering the defendant alleged in substance that he is not indebted to the plaintiff for the reason that he does not operate his business on an employer and employee basis, that the operators in his barber shop are independent operators, in that they "merely lease" space in his shop in which to conduct their own individual businesses, that their relationship with him is that of lessor and lessees, and that because of this relationship he is not indebted to the plaintiff as an employer for the unemployment tax attempted to be levied upon him. Attached to the answer there appears a copy of an agreement purporting to be a lease contract entered into between the defendant and one of his operators, which is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tharp v. Unemployment Compensation Commission, 2201
... ... Industrial Commission ... v. Life Ins. Co. (Colo.) 88 P.2d 560; Young v. Bureau of ... Unemployment Compensation (Ga.) 10 S.E.2d 412; Payne ... Lumber Co. v ... ...
-
Zehender & Factor, Inc. v. Murphy
...Androscoggin Junior, Inc., 137 Me. 154, 16 A.2d 252;New Haven Metal & Heating Co. v. Danaher, 128 Conn. 213, 21 A.2d 383;Young v. Bureau of Unemp. Comp., 10 S.E.2d 412;Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. State U. C. Comm., 167 Or. 142, 103 P.2d 708,116 P.2d 744, 138 A.L.R. 1398. Illinois remedial ......
-
Mulhausen v. Bates
...114 P.2d 995 9 Wn.2d 264 MULHAUSEN v. BATES, Commissioner of Unemployment Compensation and Placement. STATE ex rel. MULHAUSEN v. SUPERIOR COURT ... Young v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, 63 ... Ga.App. 130, 10 ... ...
-
Copen v. Hix
...3 Horack, Sutherland Statutory Construction, 3d Ed., Section 7211. The Court of Appeals of Georgia in Young v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, 63 Ga. App. 130, 10 S. E. 2d 412, in construing a preamble setting out the purpose of the Georgia Act, which has the same purport as the West V......