Young v. Kenley, 79-1234
| Decision Date | 11 December 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-1234,79-1234 |
| Citation | 614 F.2d 373 |
| Parties | 27 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 203, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,417, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,617 Willie E. YOUNG, Appellant, v. Dr. J. B. KENLEY, Individually and as Commissioner of Health, Virginia State Department of Health; Sarah E. Sayers, Individually and as Director of Public Health Nursing, Virginia State Department of Health; Wayne Hardin, Individually and as Director of Personnel, Virginia State Department of Health; H. H. Hedley, Individually and as Retired and Former Director of Personnel, Virginia State Department of Health, jointly and severally, Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Brent E. Simmons, New York City (Elaine R. Jones, New York City, Charles M. L. Mangum, Leonard L. Brown, Jr., Lynchburg, Va., on brief), for appellant.
John R. Butcher, Richmond, Va. , for appellees.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. The action was settled during trial. Plaintiff moved for an award of attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1988 and 2000e-5(k), contending that she was the "prevailing party." The district court denied such relief, Young v. Kenley, 465 F.Supp. 1260 (E.D.Va.1979), and plaintiff appeals. We vacate the district court's order and remand for consideration of plaintiff's application in light of this court's recent opinion in Bonnes v. Long, 599 F.2d 1316 (4th Cir. 1979).
The district court properly noted that a plaintiff whose case ends in settlement may be considered a "prevailing party" under the civil rights attorney's fees provisions. In making its determination whether the plaintiff was in fact the "prevailing party," the court applied the test set forth in Nadeau v. Helgemoe, 581 F.2d 275 (1st Cir. 1978). After the district court rendered its opinion, this court issued its decision in Bonnes. Bonnes establishes the test to be applied in this circuit for the consideration whether a party to a case which ends in settlement is a "prevailing party" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1988 and 2000e-5(k).
Accordingly, the order of the district court is vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kirchberg v. Feenstra
...(no fee award to plaintiff whose frivolous suit was unnecessary to obtain relief desired) (alternate holding), vacated Young v. Kenley, 614 F.2d 373 (4th Cir.1979), reversed, Young v. Kenley, 641 F.2d 192 (4th Cir.1981). This line of cases may properly be analyzed as one in which plaintiffs......
-
Gillespie v. Brewer
... ... It is recognized that "compromise is integral to settlement." Young v. Kenley, 641 F.2d 192, 195 (4th Cir.1981). Plaintiff's recovery, while it is not the fruits of a ... ...
-
BERNSTEIN BY BERNSTEIN v. Menard
...consideration consequent to the filing of the suit. See Young v. Kenley, 465 F.Supp. 1260 (E.D. Va.), vacated and remanded, 614 F.2d 373 (4th Cir.1979), 485 F.Supp. 365 (E.D.Va. 1980), rev'd, 641 F.2d 192 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 961, 102 S.Ct. 1476, 71 L.Ed.2d 681 Of course, ......
-
Young v. Kenley
...State Department of Health because of her race. In the appeal from the district court's first denial of attorneys' fees, Young v. Kenley, 614 F.2d 373 (4th Cir. 1979), we remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Bonnes v. Long, 559 F.2d 1316 (4th Cir. Upon remand the district court......