Young v. McIllhenny
| Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | LASSING, J. |
| Citation | Young v. McIllhenny, 116 S.W. 728 (Ky. Ct. App. 1909) |
| Decision Date | 24 February 1909 |
| Parties | YOUNG v. McILLHENNY. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cumberland County.
"Not to be officially reported."
Suit by J. S. Young against John A. McIllhenny for rent aided by attachment. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed.
Sandidge & Sandidge, Porter & Sandidge, and Allen Sandidge, for appellant.
Allen & Ewing and Hazelrigg & Hazelrigg, for appellee.
This litigation involves the construction of the following leases and contract:
The second lease is in all things like the first, except that it only covers 50 acres of land, and the annual rental provided for is $50.
Contract
Plaintiff Young, brought suit against the defendant, McIllhenny, for $125, alleged to be due him as the rental under said leases for one year, and caused a general order of attachment to be issued against the property of the defendant McIllhenny. This...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Union Gas & Oil Co. v. Wiedemann Oil Co.
...and they rely principally upon the cases from this court of Berry v. Frisbie, 120 Ky. 337, 86 S.W. 558, 27 Ky. Law Rep. 724; Young v. McIllhenny, 116 S.W. 728; Killebrew v. Murray, 151 Ky. 345, 151 S.W. 662, Soaper v. King, 167 Ky. 121, 180 S.W. 46. In some of them, at least, there are expr......
-
Lindlay v. Raydure
... ... 637, 87 S.W. 1102; Monarch Oil & Gas Co. v ... Richardson, 124 Ky. 602, 99 S.W. 668; Flanagan v ... Marsh (Ky.) 105 S.W. 424; Young v. McIllhenny ... (Ky.) 116 S.W. 728; Breckenridge A. Co. v ... Richardson, 147 Ky. 834, 146 S.W. 437; Eastern Ky ... M.T. Co. v. Swann Day ... ...
-
Brown v. Wilson
...Oil Co., 47 W.Va. 84, 34 S.E. 923; Harness v. Oil Co., 49 W.Va. 232, 38 S.E. 670; Cowan v. Iron Co., 83 Va. 547, 3 S.E. 120." Young v. McIllhenny (Ky.) 116 S.W. 728, was a for delay money due on two certain oil and gas leases, alike in all essential particulars. They were "unless" leases, a......
-
Love Petroleum Co. v. Atlantic Oil Producing Co.
... ... Flewellen, 48 S.W.2d 813; Texas Co. v. Davis, ... 113 Tex. 325, 254 S.W. 304, 255 S.W. 601; Humble Oil Co ... v. Davis, 296 S.W. 285; Young v. Jones, 222 ... S.W. 691; Habermel v. Mong, 31 F.2d 822; ... Gillespie v. Bobo, 271 F. 641; 1 Thornton's Law ... of Oil and Gas (4 Ed.), p. 239, ... 719, 119 P. 260; McKinley v. Feagins, 82 Okla. 193, ... 198 P. 997; Jones v. Murphy, 253 S.W. 634; Young ... v. McIllhenny, 116 S.W. 728; Chi.-Okla. Oil & Gas ... Co. v. Shertzer, 105 Okla. 111, 231 P. 877; Sparks ... v. Albin, 195 Ky. 52, 241 S.W. 321; Union Gas & Oil ... ...