Young v. Pennsylvania Co.
Decision Date | 29 October 1889 |
Citation | 46 Ohio St. 558,24 N.E. 595 |
Parties | YOUNG, Treasurer, v. PENNSYLVANIA CO. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Error to circuit court, Holmes county.
Rev. St. Ohio, § 6710, as amended by act May 4, 1885, is as follows:
Critchfield & Huston , for plaintiff in error.
Rush Taggart , for defendant in error.
A finding of fact made by the circuit court from the evidence contained in a bill of exceptions in a case before it on error is not authorized by section 6710, Rev. St., as amended May 4, 1885, (82 Ohio Laws, 230,) and, if in fact made, will present no question that this court will review. Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Alexander v. Pennsylvania Co.
...the facts, and state them separately from its conclusions of law. Senff v. Pyle, 46 Ohio St. 102, 24 N.E. 595; Young v. Pennsylvania Co., 46 Ohio St. 558, 24 N.E. 595. Neither does it give as the ground of the reversal any one the errors assigned in that court. What it really does disclose ......
-
Charles v. Fawley
... ... the following authorities: ... Railway ... Co. v. Thurstin, 44 Ohio St. 525; Young, Treas. v ... Pennsylvania Co., 46 Ohio St. 558; Senff v. Pyle, 46 Ohio St ... 102; Landon v. Reid, 10 Ohio 202; Dial v. Holter, 6 Ohio St ... ...