Young v. Price, 4250
| Decision Date | 20 March 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. 4250,4250 |
| Citation | 390 P.2d 141,47 Haw. 408 |
| Parties | Mary Ruth YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis P. PRICE and Allen L. Souza, individually and doing business as Price Concrete Tank Company, an Hawaiian co-partnership, Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | Hawaii Supreme Court |
On petition for rehearing.
For original opinion see Hawaii, 388 P.2d 203.
Ralph E. Corey, Honolulu (Clark & Corey, Honolulu, of counsel), for the petition.
Before TSUKIYAMA, C. J., and CASSIDY, WIRTZ, LEWIS and MIZUHA, JJ.
The petition for rehearing is granted. Argument, confined to Part 'A' of the petition, will be had, without further briefing, on April 14, 1964, at 9:00 a. m.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Franco v. Fujimoto
... ... A person can sell quantities of his blood, but there is no mart where the price of a voluntary subjection of oneself to pain and suffering is or can be fixed. It has never been ... Nawelo v. von Hamm-Young Co., 21 Haw. 644, is the only direct authority cited in support of defendant's contention. In that ... ...
- Young v. Price
-
Yoshizaki v. Hilo Hospital
...his view while the case is still under the control of the court. Jacobs v. Queen Ins. Co., 123 Wis. 608, 101 N.W. 1090; Young v. Price, 47 Haw. 408, 390 P.2d 141. In this case any one of the justices who signed the opinion of the court could have joined the dissenting justices in ordering a......
-
Young v. Price, 4250
...negligence] of the motions for a directed verdict made by the defendants.' Plaintiff's petition for rehearing was granted. 47 Haw. 408, 390 P.2d 141. The basic rule governing the determination of whether there was sufficient evidence to take the contributory negligence issue to the jury is ......