Young v. State, 196
Decision Date | 12 September 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 196,196 |
Citation | 266 Md. 438,294 A.2d 467 |
Parties | Michael George YOUNG v. STATE of Maryland. |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals.
Submitted on the Petition by Thomas C. Hayden, Jr., La Plata, for appellant.
Submitted to BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.
This Court, having granted a writ of certiorari and in accordance with Maryland Rule 811 b having determined that no error of law appears in the decision, adopts the opinion of Judge Moylan for the Court of Special Appeals in Young v. State, 15 Md.App. 707, 292 A.2d 137 and affirms the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Frazier
... ... 2 ... Page 427 ... Soon after § 591 was enacted, but prior to the adoption of Rule 746, it was held in [470 A.2d 1272] Young v. State, 15 Md.App. 707, 292 A.2d 137, summarily aff'd, 266 Md. 438, 294 A.2d 467 (1972), that the requirements of § 591 were only "directory" and ... ...
-
Jones v. State, 130
... ... 27, § 591, which was incorporated by reference in former Rule 740 and was construed as being only directory in Young v. State [15 Md.App. 707, 292 A.2d 137, summarily aff'd, 266 Md. 438, 294 A.2d 467 (1972) ], supra. Consequently, our holdings in the instant case ... ...
-
McClain v. State
...noncompliance with the 120-day requirement. In so interpreting the rule, we in effect overruled an earlier precedent, Young v. State, 266 Md. 438, 294 A.2d 467 (1972), which held the provisions of a similarly worded statute to be directory only. Hicks involved, as here, a nonconstitutional ......
-
State v. Hicks
...noncompliance. We adopted that view by summarily approving the opinion of the Court of Special Appeals. See Young v. State, 266 Md. 438, 294 A.2d 467 (1972). Section 591 is plainly a declaration of legislative policy designed to obtain prompt disposition of criminal charges; its enactment m......