Young v. State, F-349

Decision Date29 September 1964
Docket NumberNo. F-349,F-349
Citation167 So.2d 622
PartiesJohnny YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Johnny Young, in pro. per.

James W. Kynes, Atty. Gen., and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that appellant seeks review under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, of judgments of conviction as to which the sentences imposed have been served, the subject is moot and this appeal is hereby dismissed.

STURGIS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Wilcox v. State, R--223
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 28, 1972
    ...where such sentence was used to enhance punishment on his present Federal sentence.' The State argues, citing this Court's opinion in Young v. State, 1 that Wilcox's petition is not cognizable because he has admittedly served the sentence imposed by the challenged conviction. The foregoing ......
  • Wingard v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 17, 1968
    ...service of the sentence. Desrosiers v. State, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 834; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 243; Young v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 622. It appears from the record that the sentence appealed from has already expired. Accordingly, petitioner's appeal must be LILES......
  • North v. State, K--468
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 21, 1969
    ...Accordingly, the appeal herein is quashed on the authority of State ex rel. Brown v. Cochran, 118 So.2d 5 (Fla.); Young v. State, 167 So.2d 622 (Fla.App. 1st 1964); Desrosiers v. State, 189 So.2d 834 (Fla.App. 1st WIGGINTON, C.J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur. ...
  • Smith v. State, 64-1063
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 11, 1965
    ...no relief may be granted as to Cases No. 8799 and No. 60-1800, because appellant is not in custody under these sentences. Young v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 622. As to Case No. 63-8957, appellant alleges, (1) that he was not given a preliminary hearing, and (2) that the Public Defender......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT