Young v. State, CR 07-628.

Decision Date24 January 2008
Docket NumberNo. CR 07-628.,CR 07-628.
Citation272 S.W.3d 109,372 Ark. 219
PartiesMarcus D. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

William M. Howard, Jr., for appellant.

No response.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Marcus Young, by and through his attorney, William M. Howard, Jr., has filed a motion to file belated brief. Appellant's brief was due on September 8, 2007, and on September 10, 2007, Appellant's original brief was tendered. However, pages four and five of the argument section were missing, and the judgment and commitment order was not included in the addendum. Appellant's attorney was notified that there were some corrections to be made and that he must file a motion for belated brief. On November 20, 2007, the brief was tendered again, but the argument section of the brief was numbered incorrectly. Appellant's attorney again was notified that additional changes were necessary. On December 17, 2007, Appellant tendered the brief and filed this motion for belated brief.

Although this brief was tendered late, we will accept a criminal appellant's belated brief to prevent an appeal from being aborted. Stewart v. State, 319 Ark. 242, 889 S.W.2d 771 (1995). Appellant's attorney does not admit fault, but his fault is clear from the record. Thus, we grant Appellant's motion, and we refer the matter to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Cooper v. Bryant
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • 23 février 2022
    ...lacks jurisdiction to address Smith's argument that the circuit court erred in approving the settlement. Smith, 372 Ark. at 189-190, 272 S.W.3d at 109. --------- ...
  • Smith v. Estate of Howell, 07-703.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 24 janvier 2008
  • Sey v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 5 janvier 2012
    ...appellant's motion for belated brief. Counsel's fault is clear from the record and constitutes good cause). Young v. State, 372 Ark. 219, 272 S.W.3d 109 (2008) (per curiam). Accordingly, we grant the instant motion and refer the matter to the Committee on Professional Conduct.Motion ...
  • Mancia v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 1 décembre 2011
    ...she inadvertently missed the deadline. Her fault is clear from the record and constitutes good cause. See, e.g., Young v. State, 372 Ark. 219, 272 S.W.3d 109 (2008) (per curiam). Accordingly, we grant the instant motions to reconsider dismissal and reinstate appeal and to file belated brief......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT