Your Homes, Inc. v. City of Portland Bd. of Zoning Appeals

Decision Date07 January 1972
Citation285 A.2d 372
PartiesYOUR HOMES, INC. v. CITY OF PORTLAND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS.
CourtMaine Supreme Court

Charles A. Lane, Robert W. Donovan, Portland, for defendant.

Before DUFRESNE, C. J., and WEBBER, WEATHERBEE, POMEROY and ARCHIBALD, JJ.

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

On appeal.

The plaintiff, owner of certain real estate in the City of Portland, filed an application with the Building Inspector of the City of Portland requesting permission to use its property as a mobile home park. This application was denied and an appeal was taken to the Zoning Board of Appeals, which Board sustained the decision of the Building Inspector. The plaintiff seasonably appealed to the Superior Court pursuant to the provisions of 30 M.R.S.A., § 4954, subd. 2 par. B. The notice of the appeal was served by summons as provided in M.R.C.P., Rule 4.

On October 28, 1970, a Justice of the Superior Court dismissed the appeal because 'the Plaintiff failed to have Notice of the Appeal ordered by the Court as required by 30 M.R.S.A., § 4854 B (sic) and this Court is therefore without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.' The plaintiff on October 30, 1970, filed a motion to amend the process which was denied.

The propriety of these rulings is the only issue before this Court.

30 M.R.S.A., § 4954, subd. 2 provides for an appeal from the decision of a zoning board of appeals to the Superior Court in this language:

'An appeal may be taken from any decision of the building inspector to the board of appeals, and from the board of appeal to the Superior Court.'

Such appeal must be taken within thirty days after the decision. The statute in force at the time, 30 M.R.S.A., § 4954, subd. 2, par. B, provided that '(n) otice of the appeal shall be ordered by the court . . .' The plaintiff did not obtain a special order of court for service of a notice of appeal and the Justice below based his dismissal of the complaint upon this failure.

4 M.R.S.A., § 8 vests the Supreme Judicial Court with rule making power:

'The Supreme Judicial Court shall have the power to prescribe, by general rules, for the District and Superior Courts of Maine, the forms of process, writs, pleadings and motions, and the practice and procedure in civil actions at law. . . . After the effective date of said rules as promulgated or amended, all laws in conflict therewith shall be of no further force or effect.'

This power was exercised and the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure became effective December 1, 1959.

By Chapter 317 of the Public Laws of 1959 the legislature by an omnibus act amended the procedural statutes to bring them into conformity with the new rules. Although the above quoted provision of § 4954, subd. 2, par. B was not altered by amendment, we view it as a legislative oversight. We note that this section was amended by the legislature in 1971 so that Paragraph B of Subsection 2 thereof reads as follows:

'B. The appeal to the Superior Court must be taken within 30 days after the decision is rendered by filing a complaint and following the procedure set forth in Rule 80B of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure. The hearing before the Superior Court is a trial de novo without jury.'

Service of process is prodedural. The plaintiff actually noted its appeal seasonably. M.R.C.P., Rule 80B provides the procedure by which the Superior Court on appeal may review the proceedings had before a governmental agency such as the zoning board of appeals. This rule contains the following provisions:

'The complaint and summons shall be served upon the agency and all parties in accordance with the provisions of Rule 4. The complaint shall include a concise statement of the grounds upon which the plaintiff contends he is entitled to relief, and shall demand the relief to which he believes himself entitled.'

The record before us indicates a compliance with this...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • 30 Julio 1981
    ...by the Superior Court on procedural grounds. An appeal was taken to this Court and we reversed. Your Homes, Inc. v. City of Portland Board of Zoning Appeals, Me., 285 A.2d 372 (1972). A motion to amend the complaint in 70-740 was denied in November 1973. Your Home filed another application ......
  • Arsenault v. Crossman
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • 5 Mayo 1997
    ...promulgating rules of civil procedure exercises its authority to enact measures that regulate court procedure. Your Homes, Inc. v. City of Portland, 285 A.2d 372, 374 (Me. 1972); 4 M.R.S.A. § 8 (1989). 3 If in the course of a proceeding to which the Rules of Civil Procedure are applicable a......
  • Stucki v. Plavin
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • 7 Junio 1972
    ...sub. 2, par. B. That this order of notice was unnecessary is a conclusion reached by this Court in Your Homes, Inc. v. City of Portland Board of Zoning Appeals, Me., 285 A.2d 372 (1972). See also 30 M.R.S.A. § 2411, sub. 3, par. 'Sterns Real Estate' applied for and received a permit from th......
  • Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • 11 Octubre 1985
    ...(Mem.), Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland, 432 A.2d 1250 (Me.1981) (Your Home II ) and Your Homes, Inc. v. City of Portland Board of Zoning Appeals, 285 A.2d 372 (Me.1972) (Your Home I ). 1 We incorporate that history insofar as it may be useful to answer the question now before us: What ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT